PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDN.L vs. FKUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDN.L vs. FKUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDN.L) and First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist (FKUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDN.L achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly lower than FKUD.L's 5.46% return.


FDN.L

1D
-1.74%
1M
6.51%
YTD
3.78%
6M
2.71%
1Y
11.26%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*

FKUD.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
2.07%
YTD
5.46%
6M
10.02%
1Y
18.22%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
4.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDN.L vs. FKUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDN.L
First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD
3.78%2.35%32.65%45.94%-40.28%8.39%48.88%14.03%-15.50%
FKUD.L
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist
5.46%24.21%7.17%10.50%-17.38%16.72%-9.94%26.72%-20.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FDN.L and FKUD.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2018

0.42

The correlation between FDN.L and FKUD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDN.L vs. FKUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDN.L
FKUD.L

Technology

41.7%

-

Communication Services

27.7%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

26.1%
13.2%

Financial Services

2.0%
27.7%

Industrials

1.3%
11.4%

Healthcare

1.1%
5.3%

Basic Materials

-

17.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.7%

Energy

-

4.0%

Real Estate

-

4.0%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Technology

FDN.L
41.7%
FKUD.L

-

Communication Services

FDN.L
27.7%
FKUD.L
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FDN.L
26.1%
FKUD.L
13.2%

Financial Services

FDN.L
2.0%
FKUD.L
27.7%

Industrials

FDN.L
1.3%
FKUD.L
11.4%

Healthcare

FDN.L
1.1%
FKUD.L
5.3%

Basic Materials

FDN.L

-

FKUD.L
17.8%

Consumer Defensive

FDN.L

-

FKUD.L
6.7%

Energy

FDN.L

-

FKUD.L
4.0%

Real Estate

FDN.L

-

FKUD.L
4.0%

Utilities

FDN.L

-

FKUD.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDN.L vs. FKUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDN.L
FDN.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FKUD.L
FKUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FKUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDN.L vs. FKUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDN.L) and First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist (FKUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDN.LFKUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.24

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

1.54

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

5.27

-4.03

FDN.L vs. FKUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the FKUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDN.L and FKUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDN.LFKUD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.34

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.34

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.28

+0.06

Drawdowns

FDN.L vs. FKUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDN.L drawdown since its inception was -46.90%, roughly equal to the maximum FKUD.L drawdown of -47.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN.L and FKUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDN.LFKUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.90%

-47.29%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.87%

-11.78%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.22%

-13.54%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.90%

-29.27%

-17.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.39%

-4.27%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.81%

-8.89%

-5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.07%

3.45%

+5.62%

Volatility

FDN.L vs. FKUD.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDN.L) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist (FKUD.L) at 5.18%. This indicates that FDN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDN.LFKUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

5.18%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

11.59%

+2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.42%

13.52%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.41%

15.15%

+9.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.51%

18.01%

+6.50%

FDN.L vs. FKUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDN.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FKUD.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDN.L vs. FKUD.L - Dividend Comparison

FDN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FKUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDN.L
First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FKUD.L
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Dist
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.04%0.03%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDN.L and FKUD.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FDN.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FDN.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FKUD.L.

FDN.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while FKUD.L is Europe Equities. FDN.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while FKUD.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FDN.L and 0.65% for FKUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDN.L and FKUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer