FDMMX vs. NMTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (FDMMX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX).
FDMMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 10, 1983. NMTRX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 30, 2007.
Performance
FDMMX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDMMX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMMX Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund | -0.45% | 5.24% | 1.27% | 5.76% | -9.67% | 1.11% | 4.27% | 7.09% | -0.13% | 5.48% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | -0.12% | 3.90% | 1.99% | 6.21% | -11.98% | 2.69% | 5.25% | 9.26% | 1.06% | 7.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDMMX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than NMTRX's -0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FDMMX has underperformed NMTRX with an annualized return of 1.70%, while NMTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.27% annualized return.
FDMMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
NMTRX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDMMX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDMMX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDMMX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank
FDMMX
NMTRX
FDMMX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (FDMMX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDMMX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 0.84 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 1.16 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.23 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 0.99 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 2.89 | +1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDMMX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 0.84 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.10 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.52 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.97 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDMMX and NMTRX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDMMX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison
FDMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than NMTRX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMMX Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund | 2.71% | 3.54% | 2.67% | 2.43% | 1.46% | 2.31% | 2.23% | 2.63% | 2.76% | 2.99% | 4.56% | 3.20% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | 4.19% | 4.46% | 3.55% | 3.67% | 3.28% | 2.73% | 2.92% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 3.28% | 3.71% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
FDMMX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDMMX drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, which is greater than NMTRX's maximum drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMMX and NMTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDMMX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.98% | -16.36% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.14% | -4.75% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.70% | -16.36% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.70% | -16.36% | +2.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -2.25% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -2.93% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 1.62% | -0.46% |
Volatility
FDMMX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (FDMMX) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) at 1.07%. This indicates that FDMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDMMX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 1.07% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.69% | 1.82% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 4.93% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.62% | 3.97% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.83% | 4.38% | -0.55% |