FDLSX vs. FCYIX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FDLSX (Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio) and FCYIX (Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio) are both mutual funds - FDLSX is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FCYIX is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDLSX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FCYIX.

Performance

FDLSX vs. FCYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio (FCYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FDLSX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -0.85%
• 6M: -4.20%
• YTD: -2.80%
• 1Y: -19.18%
• 3Y*: 5.46%
• 5Y*: 6.49%
• 10Y*: 10.94%

FCYIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLSX vs. FCYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio	-2.80%	-5.30%	20.17%	30.14%	-15.27%	21.66%	18.59%	28.78%	-7.65%	29.09%
FCYIX Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio	0.00%	20.95%	23.32%	23.21%	-10.47%	16.94%	11.91%	28.02%	-15.34%	19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLSX and FCYIX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 1997	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between FDLSX and FCYIX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDLSX vs. FCYIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDLSX	FCYIX
Consumer Cyclical	91.2%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	-
Energy	1.1%	-
Technology	0.6%	4.4%
Industrials	0.5%	93.6%
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FDLSX vs. FCYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLSX

FDLSX Risk / Return Rank: 1
FDLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FCYIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLSX vs. FCYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio (FCYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDLSX	FCYIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.10	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FDLSX	FCYIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.34%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.96%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDLSX	FCYIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.83%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.63%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.35%	—	—

FDLSX vs. FCYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FCYIX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDLSX vs. FCYIX - Dividend Comparison

FDLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, while FCYIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCYIX Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio	1.58%	2.26%	4.30%	5.86%	3.94%	27.55%	2.89%	4.16%	9.54%	5.06%	4.32%	6.61%
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio	5.31%	9.12%	7.41%	1.64%	3.32%	22.77%	2.36%	6.43%	19.76%	6.33%	1.01%	5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDLSX and FCYIX in my portfolio?

FDLSX and FCYIX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.