FDIG vs. TRUT
FDIG (Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIG is a Blockchain fund tracking the Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index, while TRUT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VanEck. FDIG is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
FDIG vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIG achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly lower than TRUT's 25.30% return.
FDIG
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 50.23%
- 3Y*
- 40.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDIG vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | 19.73% | 3.40% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIG and TRUT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIG vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
FDIG
TRUT
FDIG vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIG | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIG | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 2.39 | -2.09 |
Drawdowns
FDIG vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIG drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIG and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIG | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.32% | -18.55% | -39.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.70% | -1.46% | -19.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.16% | -5.17% | -20.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.11% | — | — |
Volatility
FDIG vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIG | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.60% | 21.53% | +28.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.81% | 21.53% | +39.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.81% | 21.53% | +39.28% |
FDIG vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIG vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
FDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than TRUT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.17% | 0.18% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIG and TRUT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDIG.
FDIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.
FDIG is categorized as Blockchain, while TRUT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDIG and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for FDIG and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer