FDIG vs. BPAY
FDIG (Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF) and BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIG is a Blockchain fund tracking the Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index, while BPAY is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. FDIG is passively managed, while BPAY is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDIG returned 40.44%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for BPAY. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BPAY.
Performance
FDIG vs. BPAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIG achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than BPAY's -12.44% return.
FDIG
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 50.23%
- 3Y*
- 40.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BPAY
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- -12.44%
- 6M
- -14.32%
- 1Y
- -10.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDIG vs. BPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | 19.73% | 19.92% | 18.41% | 166.00% | -43.41% |
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | -12.44% | 8.54% | 17.28% | 13.19% | -16.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIG and BPAY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FDIG and BPAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDIG vs. BPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDIG
BPAY
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FDIG
BPAY
Technology
FDIG
BPAY
Industrials
FDIG
BPAY
Communication Services
FDIG
BPAY
-
Utilities
FDIG
BPAY
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDIG
BPAY
Basic Materials
FDIG
-
BPAY
-
Consumer Defensive
FDIG
-
BPAY
-
Energy
FDIG
-
BPAY
-
Healthcare
FDIG
-
BPAY
-
Real Estate
FDIG
-
BPAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIG vs. BPAY — Risk / Return Rank
FDIG
BPAY
FDIG vs. BPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIG | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.95 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | -0.32 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | -0.64 | +2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIG | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | -0.42 | +1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.06 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
FDIG vs. BPAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIG drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, which is greater than BPAY's maximum drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIG and BPAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIG | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.32% | -33.62% | -24.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.69% | -33.62% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.66% | -33.62% | -16.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.70% | -26.03% | +5.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.16% | -10.54% | -15.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.11% | 16.98% | +7.13% |
Volatility
FDIG vs. BPAY - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) has a higher volatility of 12.92% compared to BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) at 6.91%. This indicates that FDIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIG | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.92% | 6.91% | +6.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.95% | 18.71% | +17.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.60% | 26.01% | +23.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.81% | 24.35% | +36.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.81% | 24.35% | +36.46% |
FDIG vs. BPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BPAY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIG vs. BPAY - Dividend Comparison
FDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than BPAY's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | 7.41% | 6.49% | 0.48% | 1.18% | 0.18% |
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.17% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIG and BPAY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDIG has higher volatility (12.92%) compared to BPAY (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIG dropped -58.32% vs BPAY's -33.62%.
On 3-year performance, FDIG leads with 40.44% vs 8.49% for BPAY. On fees, FDIG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, BPAY has been the lower-risk option at 6.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FDIG has performed better with a 40.44% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.
BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 1.03% for FDIG.
FDIG is categorized as Blockchain, while BPAY is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDIG and 0.70% for BPAY.
FDIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIG and BPAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer