PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIG vs. BPAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIG vs. BPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIG achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than BPAY's -12.44% return.


FDIG

1D
-2.69%
1M
10.27%
YTD
19.73%
6M
6.20%
1Y
50.23%
3Y*
40.44%
5Y*
10Y*

BPAY

1D
-4.23%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
-12.44%
6M
-14.32%
1Y
-10.80%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIG vs. BPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FDIG
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF
19.73%19.92%18.41%166.00%-43.41%
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
-12.44%8.54%17.28%13.19%-16.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIG and BPAY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022

0.65

The correlation between FDIG and BPAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDIG vs. BPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIG
BPAY

Financial Services

56.6%
53.0%

Technology

39.5%
36.4%

Industrials

1.7%
4.6%

Communication Services

0.9%

-

Utilities

0.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
6.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Financial Services

FDIG
56.6%
BPAY
53.0%

Technology

FDIG
39.5%
BPAY
36.4%

Industrials

FDIG
1.7%
BPAY
4.6%

Communication Services

FDIG
0.9%
BPAY

-

Utilities

FDIG
0.8%
BPAY

-

Consumer Cyclical

FDIG
0.5%
BPAY
6.0%

Basic Materials

FDIG

-

BPAY

-

Consumer Defensive

FDIG

-

BPAY

-

Energy

FDIG

-

BPAY

-

Healthcare

FDIG

-

BPAY

-

Real Estate

FDIG

-

BPAY
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIG vs. BPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIG
FDIG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FDIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BPAY
BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIG vs. BPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDIGBPAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.95

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

-0.32

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.09

-0.64

+2.73

FDIG vs. BPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the BPAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIG and BPAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDIGBPAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

-0.42

+1.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.06

+0.24

Drawdowns

FDIG vs. BPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIG drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, which is greater than BPAY's maximum drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIG and BPAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIGBPAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.32%

-33.62%

-24.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.69%

-33.62%

-13.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.66%

-33.62%

-16.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.70%

-26.03%

+5.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.16%

-10.54%

-15.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.11%

16.98%

+7.13%

Volatility

FDIG vs. BPAY - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) has a higher volatility of 12.92% compared to BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) at 6.91%. This indicates that FDIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDIGBPAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.92%

6.91%

+6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.95%

18.71%

+17.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.60%

26.01%

+23.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.81%

24.35%

+36.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.81%

24.35%

+36.46%

FDIG vs. BPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BPAY's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIG vs. BPAY - Dividend Comparison

FDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than BPAY's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
7.41%6.49%0.48%1.18%0.18%
FDIG
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF
1.03%1.14%1.17%0.18%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIG and BPAY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIG has higher volatility (12.92%) compared to BPAY (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIG dropped -58.32% vs BPAY's -33.62%.

On 3-year performance, FDIG leads with 40.44% vs 8.49% for BPAY. On fees, FDIG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, BPAY has been the lower-risk option at 6.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FDIG has performed better with a 40.44% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.

BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 1.03% for FDIG.

FDIG is categorized as Blockchain, while BPAY is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDIG and 0.70% for BPAY.

FDIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIG and BPAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer