PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIG vs. BITQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDIG vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDIG vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FDIG
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF
-14.57%19.92%18.41%166.00%-56.18%
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
-5.92%18.00%46.97%246.83%-74.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIG achieves a -14.57% return, which is significantly lower than BITQ's -5.92% return.


FDIG

1D
0.31%
1M
-9.90%
YTD
-14.57%
6M
-32.88%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
28.85%
5Y*
10Y*

BITQ

1D
-0.58%
1M
-8.31%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-26.36%
1Y
47.29%
3Y*
48.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDIG vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BITQ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDIG vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIG
FDIG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FDIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BITQ
BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIG vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDIGBITQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

0.81

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.45

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.17

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.21

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.77

2.74

-0.97

FDIG vs. BITQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is comparable to the BITQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIG and BITQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDIGBITQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

0.81

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

-0.05

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between FDIG and BITQ is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FDIG vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison

FDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
FDIG
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF
1.44%1.14%1.17%0.18%0.00%0.00%
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.90%1.51%0.00%3.12%

Drawdowns

FDIG vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIG drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, smaller than the maximum BITQ drawdown of -90.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIG and BITQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIGBITQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.32%

-90.32%

+32.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.69%

-44.99%

-1.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.42%

-42.16%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.09%

-53.86%

+27.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.12%

19.87%

+1.25%

Volatility

FDIG vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) is 16.10%, while Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a volatility of 17.63%. This indicates that FDIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDIGBITQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.10%

17.63%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.97%

45.99%

-6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.57%

58.97%

-6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.44%

67.77%

-6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.44%

67.77%

-6.33%