FDIF vs. TEC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) and TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO).
FDIF and TEC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDIF is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 16, 2020. TEC.TO is a passively managed fund by TD that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Technology Leaders Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2022.
Performance
FDIF vs. TEC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDIF vs. TEC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIF Fidelity Disruptors ETF | -8.38% | 13.83% | 19.74% | 6.49% |
TEC.TO TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF | -10.26% | 20.98% | 34.10% | 11.62% |
Different Trading Currencies
FDIF is traded in USD, while TEC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the TEC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIF achieves a -8.38% return, which is significantly higher than TEC.TO's -10.26% return.
FDIF
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -6.49%
- YTD
- -8.38%
- 6M
- -7.56%
- 1Y
- 11.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEC.TO
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -4.97%
- YTD
- -10.26%
- 6M
- -8.53%
- 1Y
- 22.19%
- 3Y*
- 23.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDIF vs. TEC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TEC.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDIF vs. TEC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FDIF
TEC.TO
FDIF vs. TEC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) and TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIF | TEC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 0.91 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 1.45 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.20 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 1.26 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | 4.23 | -1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIF | TEC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 0.91 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.72 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIF and TEC.TO is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDIF vs. TEC.TO - Dividend Comparison
FDIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than TEC.TO's 0.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIF Fidelity Disruptors ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.35% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TEC.TO TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.12% | 0.21% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.28% |
Drawdowns
FDIF vs. TEC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIF drawdown since its inception was -22.63%, smaller than the maximum TEC.TO drawdown of -39.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIF and TEC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIF | TEC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.63% | -35.31% | +12.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -17.52% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.16% | -14.34% | +3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -8.17% | +4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 5.98% | -1.95% |
Volatility
FDIF vs. TEC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO) at 7.17%. This indicates that FDIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDIF | TEC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 7.17% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.45% | 13.73% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.56% | 24.57% | -3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 24.10% | -5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 25.87% | -7.21% |