FDHY vs. NHYB
FDHY (Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF) and NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. FDHY is actively managed, while NHYB is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDHY charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for NHYB.
Performance
FDHY vs. NHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDHY achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than NHYB's 1.91% return.
FDHY
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 7.74%
- 3Y*
- 9.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
NHYB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDHY vs. NHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDHY Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF | 2.43% | 1.55% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.91% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDHY and NHYB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDHY vs. NHYB — Risk / Return Rank
FDHY
NHYB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDHY vs. NHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) and Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDHY | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDHY vs. NHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDHY drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, which is greater than NHYB's maximum drawdown of -2.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDHY and NHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDHY | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.01% | -2.40% | -17.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.20% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -0.36% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility
FDHY vs. NHYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDHY | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57% | 3.64% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 3.64% | +3.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.02% | 3.64% | +4.38% |
FDHY vs. NHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDHY has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NHYB's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDHY vs. NHYB - Dividend Comparison
FDHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than NHYB's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDHY Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF | 6.51% | 6.56% | 6.58% | 6.26% | 5.34% | 6.09% | 5.78% | 4.94% | 2.55% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.25% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDHY and NHYB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDHY.
FDHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.51%, compared with 4.25% for NHYB.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDHY and 0.08% for NHYB.
Find the right allocation for FDHY and NHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer