FDHY vs. BBHY
FDHY (Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. FDHY is actively managed, while BBHY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDHY returned 3.99%/yr vs 4.09%/yr for BBHY. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDHY charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBHY.
Performance
FDHY vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDHY achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly higher than BBHY's 1.58% return.
FDHY
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 8.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- —
BBHY
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 7.15%
- 3Y*
- 8.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.09%
- 10Y*
- —
FDHY vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDHY Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF | 2.16% | 9.24% | 7.53% | 11.14% | -11.30% | 4.33% | 10.71% | 16.87% | -2.14% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.58% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 14.35% | -2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDHY and BBHY is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FDHY and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDHY vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDHY
BBHY
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
FDHY
BBHY
Basic Materials
FDHY
-
BBHY
Communication Services
FDHY
-
BBHY
Consumer Cyclical
FDHY
-
BBHY
Consumer Defensive
FDHY
-
BBHY
Financial Services
FDHY
-
BBHY
Healthcare
FDHY
-
BBHY
Industrials
FDHY
-
BBHY
Real Estate
FDHY
-
BBHY
Technology
FDHY
-
BBHY
Utilities
FDHY
-
BBHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDHY vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank
FDHY
BBHY
FDHY vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDHY | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 1.98 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.68 | 3.01 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.39 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 3.02 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.11 | 13.58 | +3.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDHY | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.98 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.64 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
FDHY vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDHY drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDHY and BBHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDHY | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.01% | -24.98% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.12% | -2.37% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.26% | -5.00% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.38% | -15.32% | -1.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.30% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -2.37% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 0.53% | -0.03% |
Volatility
FDHY vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) at 1.12%. This indicates that FDHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDHY | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 1.12% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 2.86% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57% | 3.62% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.13% | 7.26% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.05% | 7.53% | +0.52% |
FDHY vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDHY has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDHY vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison
FDHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, less than BBHY's 6.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.95% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
FDHY Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF | 6.52% | 6.56% | 6.58% | 6.26% | 5.34% | 6.09% | 5.78% | 4.94% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDHY and BBHY have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDHY has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to BBHY (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDHY dropped -20.01% vs BBHY's -24.98%.
On 5-year performance, BBHY leads with 4.09% vs 3.99% for FDHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 4.09% return vs 3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDHY.
BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 6.52% for FDHY.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDHY and 0.15% for BBHY.
FDHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDHY and BBHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer