PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGRX vs. MEIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGRX vs. MEIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund (MEIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGRX achieves a 23.69% return, which is significantly higher than MEIFX's 6.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGRX has outperformed MEIFX with an annualized return of 23.01%, while MEIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.19% annualized return.


FDGRX

1D
0.75%
1M
9.19%
YTD
23.69%
6M
19.33%
1Y
49.90%
3Y*
31.65%
5Y*
17.30%
10Y*
23.01%

MEIFX

1D
0.94%
1M
2.74%
YTD
6.11%
6M
6.32%
1Y
10.58%
3Y*
12.00%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGRX vs. MEIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
23.69%18.54%37.18%47.25%-33.86%22.57%67.42%38.40%-4.14%36.76%
MEIFX
Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund
6.11%6.51%13.19%18.96%-16.43%15.15%26.18%44.95%-0.51%27.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGRX and MEIFX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2005

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between FDGRX and MEIFX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGRX vs. MEIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGRX
FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIFX
MEIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MEIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGRX vs. MEIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund (MEIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDGRXMEIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.81

1.20

+1.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.42

1.75

+1.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.21

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

2.02

+2.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.39

6.55

+8.84

FDGRX vs. MEIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the MEIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGRX and MEIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDGRXMEIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.20

+1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.42

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

0.80

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.53

+0.16

Drawdowns

FDGRX vs. MEIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGRX drawdown since its inception was -71.62%, which is greater than MEIFX's maximum drawdown of -54.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGRX and MEIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGRXMEIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.62%

-54.37%

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.60%

-4.80%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.19%

-19.30%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.25%

-23.54%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.25%

-28.67%

-11.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.16%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-7.72%

-8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

1.48%

+1.86%

Volatility

FDGRX vs. MEIFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund (MEIFX) at 2.31%. This indicates that FDGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGRXMEIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

2.31%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.43%

6.25%

+8.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

9.26%

+9.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.93%

15.90%

+8.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.39%

17.94%

+5.45%

FDGRX vs. MEIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIFX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGRX vs. MEIFX - Dividend Comparison

FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MEIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
0.00%0.00%8.86%3.83%7.20%10.67%8.86%3.84%6.38%4.73%6.16%3.92%
MEIFX
Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund
6.83%7.25%14.61%0.61%9.28%25.44%13.26%40.49%11.67%1.18%0.78%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDGRX and MEIFX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDGRX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to MEIFX (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGRX dropped -71.62% vs MEIFX's -54.37%.

FDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGRX and MEIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer