PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGRX vs. FDVLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGRX vs. FDVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGRX achieves a 21.71% return, which is significantly higher than FDVLX's 19.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGRX has outperformed FDVLX with an annualized return of 23.44%, while FDVLX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.67% annualized return.


FDGRX

1D
-1.05%
1M
1.13%
YTD
21.71%
6M
14.48%
1Y
44.78%
3Y*
30.10%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
23.44%

FDVLX

1D
0.06%
1M
4.49%
YTD
19.88%
6M
18.68%
1Y
36.05%
3Y*
26.96%
5Y*
15.10%
10Y*
14.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGRX vs. FDVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
21.71%18.54%37.18%47.25%-33.86%22.57%67.42%38.40%-4.14%36.76%
FDVLX
Fidelity Value Fund
19.88%11.32%30.11%19.57%-9.07%35.30%9.33%31.68%-17.58%14.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGRX and FDVLX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 1983

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between FDGRX and FDVLX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGRX vs. FDVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGRX
FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVLX
FDVLX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FDVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGRX vs. FDVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDGRXFDVLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

3.74

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.48

13.72

-0.23

FDGRX vs. FDVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the FDVLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGRX and FDVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDGRX vs. FDVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGRX drawdown since its inception was -71.62%, which is greater than FDVLX's maximum drawdown of -66.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGRX and FDVLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGRXFDVLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.62%

-66.91%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.60%

-9.90%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.19%

-31.45%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.25%

-31.45%

-8.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.25%

-48.66%

+8.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.42%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-9.01%

-6.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.70%

+0.72%

Volatility

FDGRX vs. FDVLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) at 4.94%. This indicates that FDGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGRXFDVLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.45%

4.94%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.85%

11.96%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

16.54%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.11%

26.57%

-2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.48%

25.22%

-1.74%

FDGRX vs. FDVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGRX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVLX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGRX vs. FDVLX - Dividend Comparison

FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
0.00%0.00%8.86%3.83%7.20%10.67%8.86%3.84%6.38%4.73%6.16%3.92%
FDVLX
Fidelity Value Fund
8.38%10.05%33.05%3.71%7.08%9.79%0.98%3.34%16.25%3.38%1.26%10.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDGRX and FDVLX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDGRX has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to FDVLX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGRX dropped -71.62% vs FDVLX's -66.91%.

FDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGRX and FDVLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer