FDGRX vs. AVUV

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

FDGRX (Fidelity Growth Company Fund) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both funds - FDGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDGRX returned 16.15%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for AVUV. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDGRX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.

Performance

FDGRX vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGRX achieves a 22.31% return, which is significantly higher than AVUV's 19.18% return.

FDGRX

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 3.47%
• YTD: 22.31%
• 6M: 20.57%
• 1Y: 46.04%
• 3Y*: 29.83%
• 5Y*: 16.15%
• 10Y*: 23.23%

AVUV

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 2.37%
• YTD: 19.18%
• 6M: 17.38%
• 1Y: 37.67%
• 3Y*: 18.44%
• 5Y*: 12.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGRX vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund	22.31%	18.54%	37.18%	47.25%	-33.86%	22.57%	67.42%	13.01%
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF	19.18%	7.44%	9.28%	22.82%	-4.91%	42.20%	6.43%	8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGRX and AVUV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019	0.55

The correlation between FDGRX and AVUV shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDGRX vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDGRX	AVUV
Technology	53.5%	7.4%
Communication Services	14.1%	3.1%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	18.7%
Healthcare	11.3%	4.8%
Financial Services	3.0%	26.1%
Industrials	2.7%	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	4.7%
Basic Materials	0.6%	5.1%
Energy	0.5%	15.8%
Real Estate	0.2%	0.7%
Utilities	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

FDGRX vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGRX

FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

AVUV

AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 76
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 67
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGRX vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDGRX	AVUV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.15	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	3.08	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.37	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	4.76	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.24	14.14	-0.90

FDGRX vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGRX and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDGRX vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGRX drawdown since its inception was -71.62%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGRX and AVUV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDGRX	AVUV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.62%	-49.42%	-22.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.60%	-7.95%	-4.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.19%	-28.79%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.25%	-28.79%	-11.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-2.89%	+1.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.89%	-7.90%	-7.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	2.67%	+0.75%

Volatility

FDGRX vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.67%. This indicates that FDGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDGRX	AVUV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.29%	4.67%	+2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.82%	11.42%	+4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.47%	17.64%	+1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.09%	22.71%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.47%	28.24%	-4.77%

FDGRX vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGRX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDGRX vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF	1.65%	1.58%	1.61%	1.65%	1.74%	1.28%	1.21%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.86%	3.83%	7.20%	10.67%	8.86%	3.84%	6.38%	4.73%	6.16%	3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDGRX and AVUV in my portfolio?

FDGRX and AVUV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDGRX or AVUV?

FDGRX has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to AVUV (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGRX dropped -71.62% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.