PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGLX vs. FDFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGLX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6 (FDGLX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGLX achieves a 8.37% return, which is significantly lower than FDFPX's 14.11% return.


FDGLX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.17%
YTD
8.37%
6M
9.33%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*

FDFPX

1D
0.70%
1M
5.45%
YTD
14.11%
6M
15.71%
1Y
31.31%
3Y*
21.92%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGLX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6
8.37%17.58%12.81%14.88%-16.68%11.40%15.41%7.36%
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
14.11%22.81%17.81%20.93%-18.57%16.84%18.54%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGLX and FDFPX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.97

The correlation between FDGLX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGLX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGLX
FDGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FDGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFPX
FDFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FDFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGLX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6 (FDGLX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDGLXFDFPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

2.53

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.31

3.48

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.33

-0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.71

14.77

-2.06

FDGLX vs. FDFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the FDFPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGLX and FDFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDGLXFDFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.53

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.75

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.81

-0.03

Drawdowns

FDGLX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGLX drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, smaller than the maximum FDFPX drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGLX and FDFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGLXFDFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.93%

-31.22%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-9.54%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.73%

-15.42%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-27.41%

+3.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-5.85%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

2.15%

-0.56%

Volatility

FDGLX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6 (FDGLX) is 3.13%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that FDGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGLXFDFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

4.15%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

10.33%

-3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

12.56%

-3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

15.09%

-4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.83%

17.18%

-5.35%

FDGLX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGLX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGLX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison

FDGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, more than FDFPX's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
3.75%2.87%6.56%2.22%5.41%8.52%5.38%3.19%0.00%0.00%
FDGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6
7.75%7.81%6.53%2.26%9.42%9.79%6.87%7.29%11.43%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FDGLX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDFPX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to FDGLX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGLX dropped -24.93% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.

FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGLX and FDFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer