PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGLX vs. FHGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGLX vs. FHGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6 (FDGLX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6 (FHGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGLX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than FHGLX's 8.86% return.


FDGLX

1D
0.12%
1M
2.41%
YTD
7.97%
6M
9.26%
1Y
19.72%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*

FHGLX

1D
0.12%
1M
2.66%
YTD
8.86%
6M
10.34%
1Y
21.69%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGLX vs. FHGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6
7.97%17.58%12.81%14.88%-16.68%11.40%15.41%23.04%-6.27%8.26%
FHGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6
8.86%19.05%14.37%16.96%-17.32%14.17%16.83%25.99%-7.55%7.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGLX and FHGLX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FDGLX and FHGLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGLX vs. FHGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGLX
FDGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FDGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FHGLX
FHGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FHGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FHGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGLX vs. FHGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6 (FDGLX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6 (FHGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDGLXFHGLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

2.31

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

3.27

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.98

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.84

12.92

-0.08

FDGLX vs. FHGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FHGLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGLX and FHGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDGLXFHGLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.31

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.66

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.73

+0.05

Drawdowns

FDGLX vs. FHGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGLX drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, smaller than the maximum FHGLX drawdown of -29.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGLX and FHGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGLXFHGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.93%

-29.20%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-7.55%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.73%

-11.33%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-25.75%

+1.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-5.21%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.74%

-0.15%

Volatility

FDGLX vs. FHGLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6 (FDGLX) is 3.13%, while Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6 (FHGLX) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that FDGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGLXFHGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

3.36%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

8.01%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.74%

9.66%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

12.45%

-1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.83%

14.07%

-2.24%

FDGLX vs. FHGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGLX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FHGLX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGLX vs. FHGLX - Dividend Comparison

FDGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, which matches FHGLX's 7.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6
7.78%7.81%6.53%2.26%9.42%9.79%6.87%7.29%11.43%4.31%
FHGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6
7.73%7.75%6.74%1.89%10.32%9.73%6.38%7.66%12.29%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FDGLX and FHGLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHGLX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to FDGLX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGLX dropped -24.93% vs FHGLX's -29.20%.

FHGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGLX and FHGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer