PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGLX vs. FCTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGLX vs. FCTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6 (FDGLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGLX achieves a 8.37% return, which is significantly lower than FCTKX's 13.94% return.


FDGLX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.17%
YTD
8.37%
6M
9.33%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*

FCTKX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.18%
YTD
13.94%
6M
15.86%
1Y
31.62%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGLX vs. FCTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6
8.37%17.58%12.81%14.88%-16.68%11.40%15.41%23.04%-6.27%8.26%
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
13.94%24.06%14.41%20.84%-18.09%16.86%18.53%25.67%-8.66%9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGLX and FCTKX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.98

The correlation between FDGLX and FCTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGLX vs. FCTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGLX
FDGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FDGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FCTKX
FCTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FCTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGLX vs. FCTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6 (FDGLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDGLXFCTKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

2.52

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.31

3.46

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.30

-0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.71

14.70

-1.99

FDGLX vs. FCTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the FCTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGLX and FCTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDGLXFCTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.52

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.72

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.77

+0.02

Drawdowns

FDGLX vs. FCTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGLX drawdown since its inception was -24.93%, smaller than the maximum FCTKX drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGLX and FCTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGLXFCTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.93%

-30.94%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-9.78%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.73%

-15.40%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-27.16%

+3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-5.46%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

2.18%

-0.59%

Volatility

FDGLX vs. FCTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6 (FDGLX) is 3.13%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that FDGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGLXFCTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

4.27%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

10.54%

-3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

12.80%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

15.05%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.83%

15.89%

-4.06%

FDGLX vs. FCTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGLX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGLX vs. FCTKX - Dividend Comparison

FDGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, more than FCTKX's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
5.14%4.06%2.31%2.19%11.70%11.47%4.40%6.53%7.08%2.74%
FDGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2030 Fund Class Z6
7.75%7.81%6.53%2.26%9.42%9.79%6.87%7.29%11.43%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FDGLX and FCTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCTKX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to FDGLX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGLX dropped -24.93% vs FCTKX's -30.94%.

FCTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGLX and FCTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer