FDGKX vs. TILVX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FDGKX (Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K) and TILVX (TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FDGKX returned 13.67%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for TILVX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDGKX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TILVX.

Performance

FDGKX vs. TILVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGKX achieves a 16.97% return, which is significantly higher than TILVX's 14.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGKX has outperformed TILVX with an annualized return of 13.67%, while TILVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.09% annualized return.

FDGKX

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 16.97%
• 6M: 14.91%
• 1Y: 34.88%
• 3Y*: 25.26%
• 5Y*: 14.74%
• 10Y*: 13.67%

TILVX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 14.22%
• 6M: 14.78%
• 1Y: 28.71%
• 3Y*: 18.51%
• 5Y*: 10.31%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGKX vs. TILVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDGKX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K	16.97%	19.47%	24.72%	18.00%	-11.54%	28.10%	2.31%	28.84%	-7.09%	18.03%
TILVX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund	14.22%	15.81%	14.26%	11.49%	-7.57%	25.05%	2.90%	26.48%	-8.38%	10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGKX and TILVX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008	0.92

The correlation between FDGKX and TILVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (3 years) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FDGKX vs. TILVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGKX

FDGKX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FDGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FDGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FDGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FDGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FDGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

TILVX

TILVX Risk / Return Rank: 81
TILVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
TILVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
TILVX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
TILVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
TILVX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGKX vs. TILVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDGKX	TILVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.63	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	3.71	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.47	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	4.18	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.35	17.51	-2.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDGKX vs. TILVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the TILVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGKX and TILVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDGKX	TILVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	2.63	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.70	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.63	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.48	+0.02

Drawdowns

FDGKX vs. TILVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGKX drawdown since its inception was -53.34%, smaller than the maximum TILVX drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGKX and TILVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDGKX	TILVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.34%	-60.05%	+6.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.15%	-6.80%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.35%	-15.58%	-5.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.35%	-19.00%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.28%	-40.15%	-1.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.06%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.54%	-8.26%	+1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	1.62%	+0.67%

Volatility

FDGKX vs. TILVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX) at 2.95%. This indicates that FDGKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDGKX	TILVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	2.95%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.98%	8.18%	+2.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.80%	10.84%	+2.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.69%	14.82%	+1.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.26%	17.66%	+1.60%

FDGKX vs. TILVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGKX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than TILVX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDGKX vs. TILVX - Dividend Comparison

FDGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, more than TILVX's 5.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGKX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K	6.00%	6.82%	7.46%	3.57%	11.59%	7.90%	1.98%	4.95%	23.08%	15.37%	1.70%	8.50%
TILVX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund	5.22%	5.96%	3.04%	4.90%	4.57%	3.77%	2.26%	7.05%	4.68%	2.01%	3.14%	4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDGKX and TILVX in my portfolio?

FDGKX and TILVX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDGKX or TILVX?

FDGKX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to TILVX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGKX dropped -53.34% vs TILVX's -60.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TILVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.