FDGKX vs. SMVLX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDGKX (Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K) and SMVLX (Smead Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FDGKX returned 14.14%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for SMVLX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDGKX charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for SMVLX.

Performance

FDGKX vs. SMVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGKX achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than SMVLX's 14.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGKX has outperformed SMVLX with an annualized return of 14.14%, while SMVLX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.71% annualized return.

FDGKX

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: 18.03%
• 6M: 14.19%
• 1Y: 35.58%
• 3Y*: 25.36%
• 5Y*: 15.21%
• 10Y*: 14.14%

SMVLX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 14.42%
• 6M: 13.80%
• 1Y: 27.75%
• 3Y*: 13.78%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 12.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGKX vs. SMVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDGKX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K	18.03%	19.47%	24.72%	18.00%	-11.54%	28.10%	2.31%	28.84%	-7.09%	18.03%
SMVLX Smead Value Fund	14.42%	5.05%	4.78%	16.87%	-2.79%	42.46%	1.71%	26.29%	-4.79%	19.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGKX and SMVLX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FDGKX and SMVLX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FDGKX vs. SMVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGKX

FDGKX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FDGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FDGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FDGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FDGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FDGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

SMVLX

SMVLX Risk / Return Rank: 62
SMVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
SMVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SMVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SMVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SMVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGKX vs. SMVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDGKX	SMVLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	1.89	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	2.77	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.33	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.62	4.58	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.61	13.18	+2.43

FDGKX vs. SMVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the SMVLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGKX and SMVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDGKX vs. SMVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGKX drawdown since its inception was -53.34%, which is greater than SMVLX's maximum drawdown of -39.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGKX and SMVLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDGKX	SMVLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.34%	-39.56%	-13.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.15%	-5.90%	-4.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.35%	-24.62%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.35%	-24.62%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.28%	-39.56%	-1.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-2.62%	+2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.52%	-4.58%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	2.05%	+0.29%

Volatility

FDGKX vs. SMVLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Smead Value Fund (SMVLX) at 3.58%. This indicates that FDGKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDGKX	SMVLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	3.58%	+2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.15%	8.78%	+3.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.80%	14.28%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.84%	18.37%	-1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.34%	19.49%	-0.15%

FDGKX vs. SMVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGKX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SMVLX's 1.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDGKX vs. SMVLX - Dividend Comparison

FDGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than SMVLX's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGKX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K	5.95%	6.82%	7.46%	3.57%	11.59%	7.90%	1.98%	4.95%	23.08%	15.37%	1.70%	8.50%
SMVLX Smead Value Fund	1.46%	1.67%	1.08%	1.34%	1.78%	3.91%	1.40%	3.83%	7.47%	0.22%	3.14%	3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDGKX and SMVLX in my portfolio?

FDGKX and SMVLX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDGKX or SMVLX?

FDGKX has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to SMVLX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGKX dropped -53.34% vs SMVLX's -39.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDGKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.