PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGKX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGKX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGKX achieves a 17.56% return, which is significantly higher than FNILX's 11.56% return.


FDGKX

1D
-0.08%
1M
5.11%
YTD
17.56%
6M
16.08%
1Y
35.66%
3Y*
25.47%
5Y*
15.02%
10Y*
13.73%

FNILX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.04%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.44%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGKX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDGKX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K
17.56%19.47%24.72%18.00%-11.54%28.10%2.31%28.84%-11.66%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
11.56%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGKX and FNILX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.91

The correlation between FDGKX and FNILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGKX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGKX
FDGKX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FDGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGKX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDGKXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.45

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

3.28

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.06

15.01

+1.05

FDGKX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGKX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDGKXFNILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

2.48

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.82

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.76

-0.26

Drawdowns

FDGKX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGKX drawdown since its inception was -53.34%, which is greater than FNILX's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGKX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGKXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.34%

-33.76%

-19.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-9.01%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.35%

-19.08%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.35%

-25.40%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-5.37%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.97%

+0.32%

Volatility

FDGKX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) at 2.88%. This indicates that FDGKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGKXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

2.88%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

8.99%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

11.93%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.69%

17.25%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

20.04%

-0.77%

FDGKX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGKX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGKX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FDGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGKX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K
5.97%6.82%7.46%3.57%11.59%7.90%1.98%4.95%23.08%15.37%1.70%8.50%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FDGKX and FNILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDGKX has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to FNILX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGKX dropped -53.34% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FDGKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGKX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer