PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGFX vs. SWDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGFX vs. SWDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and Schwab Dividend Equity Fund™ (SWDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGFX achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than SWDSX's 7.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGFX has outperformed SWDSX with an annualized return of 13.99%, while SWDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.28% annualized return.


FDGFX

1D
2.23%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
14.28%
6M
15.02%
1Y
34.97%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
15.16%
10Y*
13.99%

SWDSX

1D
0.63%
1M
1.00%
YTD
7.38%
6M
4.19%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
9.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGFX vs. SWDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
14.28%22.48%27.58%17.86%-11.61%27.96%2.20%28.75%-7.23%18.05%
SWDSX
Schwab Dividend Equity Fund™
7.38%12.31%17.06%6.92%-5.84%28.24%-4.33%24.32%-12.18%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGFX and SWDSX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2003

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between FDGFX and SWDSX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGFX vs. SWDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGFX
FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDSX
SWDSX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SWDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGFX vs. SWDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and Schwab Dividend Equity Fund™ (SWDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDGFXSWDSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.28

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.32

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

7.85

+6.80

FDGFX vs. SWDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the SWDSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGFX and SWDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDGFX vs. SWDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than SWDSX's maximum drawdown of -50.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGFX and SWDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGFXSWDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-50.01%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-6.16%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.37%

-11.67%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-17.94%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.29%

-40.20%

-1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-0.05%

-2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-6.77%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.82%

+0.49%

Volatility

FDGFX vs. SWDSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Schwab Dividend Equity Fund™ (SWDSX) at 2.24%. This indicates that FDGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGFXSWDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

2.24%

+3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

7.36%

+4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

9.31%

+4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

13.21%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

16.89%

+2.37%

FDGFX vs. SWDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDSX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGFX vs. SWDSX - Dividend Comparison

FDGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, more than SWDSX's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
8.35%9.35%9.81%3.48%11.46%7.81%1.89%4.84%22.93%15.35%1.58%8.44%
SWDSX
Schwab Dividend Equity Fund™
1.15%1.22%2.59%2.25%6.83%16.25%2.09%6.86%11.63%10.24%1.68%14.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDGFX and SWDSX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDGFX has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to SWDSX (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGFX dropped -60.77% vs SWDSX's -50.01%.

FDGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGFX and SWDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer