PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGFX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGFX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGFX achieves a 17.96% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGFX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 14.60%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.29% annualized return.


FDGFX

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.77%
YTD
17.96%
6M
17.07%
1Y
38.96%
3Y*
27.31%
5Y*
16.25%
10Y*
14.60%

FSPSX

1D
0.18%
1M
2.11%
YTD
10.74%
6M
10.40%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGFX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
17.96%22.48%27.58%17.86%-11.61%27.96%2.20%28.75%-7.23%18.05%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
10.74%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGFX and FSPSX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.77

The correlation between FDGFX and FSPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGFX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGFX
FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGFX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDGFXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.31

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

2.26

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.27

8.48

+8.80

FDGFX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGFX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDGFX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGFX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGFXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-33.69%

-27.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-11.39%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.37%

-13.58%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-29.41%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.29%

-33.69%

-7.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-6.53%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

3.04%

-0.73%

Volatility

FDGFX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.77%. This indicates that FDGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGFXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

4.77%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

12.68%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

15.26%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

16.07%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

16.53%

+2.76%

FDGFX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGFX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FDGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than FSPSX's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
8.09%9.35%9.81%3.48%11.46%7.81%1.89%4.84%22.93%15.35%1.58%8.44%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.85%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDGFX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDGFX has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to FSPSX (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGFX dropped -60.77% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FDGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGFX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer