PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGFX vs. ARKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGFX vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGFX achieves a 15.18% return, which is significantly lower than ARKQ's 17.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGFX has underperformed ARKQ with an annualized return of 14.11%, while ARKQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.08% annualized return.


FDGFX

1D
0.78%
1M
0.18%
YTD
15.18%
6M
16.16%
1Y
36.03%
3Y*
25.87%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*
14.11%

ARKQ

1D
4.08%
1M
1.98%
YTD
17.47%
6M
19.36%
1Y
64.14%
3Y*
34.41%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
22.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGFX vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
15.18%22.48%27.58%17.86%-11.61%27.96%2.20%28.75%-7.23%18.05%
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
17.47%48.81%33.88%40.70%-46.75%1.74%107.20%25.94%-7.89%52.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGFX and ARKQ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.70

The correlation between FDGFX and ARKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGFX vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGFX
FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGFX vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDGFXARKQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.30

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.13

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.91

9.22

+5.70

FDGFX vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGFX and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDGFX vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, roughly equal to the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGFX and ARKQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGFXARKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-59.89%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-20.58%

+10.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.37%

-30.76%

+9.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-55.71%

+34.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.29%

-59.89%

+18.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-6.35%

+4.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-17.21%

+9.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

6.98%

-4.67%

Volatility

FDGFX vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) is 5.74%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 13.37%. This indicates that FDGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGFXARKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

13.37%

-7.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

26.41%

-14.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

33.76%

-19.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

32.56%

-15.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

30.01%

-10.75%

FDGFX vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGFX vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

FDGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, more than ARKQ's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.23%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
8.29%9.35%9.81%3.48%11.46%7.81%1.89%4.84%22.93%15.35%1.58%8.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDGFX and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKQ has higher volatility (13.37%) compared to FDGFX (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGFX dropped -60.77% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.

FDGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGFX and ARKQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer