PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGDX vs. FDGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGDX vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D (FDGDX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDGDX having a 15.24% return and FDGFX slightly higher at 15.73%.


FDGDX

1D
2.04%
1M
0.15%
6M
9.87%
YTD
15.24%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.16%

FDGFX

1D
2.02%
1M
0.21%
6M
10.28%
YTD
15.73%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
24.08%
5Y*
15.23%
10Y*
13.72%
ALL TIME*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FDGDX vs. FDGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGDX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D
15.24%21.56%26.30%16.72%-12.54%27.06%1.32%27.67%-7.58%17.77%
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
15.73%22.48%27.58%17.86%-11.61%27.96%2.20%28.75%-7.23%16.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGDX and FDGFX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.95

The correlation between FDGDX and FDGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGDX vs. FDGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDGDX
FDGDX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FDGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FDGFX
FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDGDX vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D (FDGDX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDGDXFDGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.69

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

11.15

+0.11

FDGDX vs. FDGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FDGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGDX and FDGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDGDX vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGDX drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum FDGFX drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGDX and FDGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGDXFDGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-60.77%

+22.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-10.16%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.70%

-21.37%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.70%

-21.37%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-2.36%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-7.50%

+2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.44%

+0.01%

Volatility

FDGDX vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D (FDGDX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) have volatilities of 4.08% and 4.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGDXFDGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

4.07%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

12.23%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

15.04%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.26%

16.79%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

19.27%

+0.12%

Dividends

FDGDX vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison

FDGDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.41%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGDX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
8.41%9.35%9.81%3.48%11.46%7.81%1.89%4.84%22.93%15.35%1.58%8.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FDGDX and FDGFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDGDX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to FDGFX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGDX dropped -38.44% vs FDGFX's -60.77%.

FDGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGDX and FDGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer