FDFZX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDFZX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class A) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FDFZX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FDFZX returned 9.56%/yr vs 17.08%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDFZX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FDFZX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class A (FDFZX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDFZX achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 18.56% return.

FDFZX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 4.78%
• YTD: 12.52%
• 6M: 14.19%
• 1Y: 28.27%
• 3Y*: 19.61%
• 5Y*: 9.56%
• 10Y*: —

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 9.10%
• YTD: 18.56%
• 6M: 19.76%
• 1Y: 44.98%
• 3Y*: 32.54%
• 5Y*: 17.08%
• 10Y*: 21.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDFZX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FDFZX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class A	12.52%	22.79%	13.32%	18.90%	-18.36%	15.78%	17.02%	8.53%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	18.56%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FDFZX and FBGRX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019	0.85

The correlation between FDFZX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDFZX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDFZX

FDFZX Risk / Return Rank: 58
FDFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FDFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FDFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FDFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FDFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDFZX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class A (FDFZX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDFZX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.67	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	3.41	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.45	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	3.67	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.67	15.56	-2.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDFZX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDFZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDFZX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDFZX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.67	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.69	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.68	+0.04

Drawdowns

FDFZX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDFZX drawdown since its inception was -31.35%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFZX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDFZX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.35%	-58.64%	+27.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.94%	-12.65%	+2.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	-27.07%	+11.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.48%	-43.08%	+15.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-12.53%	+6.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	2.98%	-0.73%

Volatility

FDFZX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class A (FDFZX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) have volatilities of 4.29% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDFZX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.29%	4.14%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.58%	13.00%	-2.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.75%	17.44%	-4.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.95%	24.88%	-9.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.13%	23.69%	-6.56%

FDFZX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDFZX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDFZX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FDFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.60%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FDFZX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2065 Fund Class A	5.70%	4.70%	1.77%	1.76%	8.58%	6.54%	2.56%	1.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDFZX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FDFZX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDFZX or FBGRX?

FDFZX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to FBGRX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDFZX dropped -31.35% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.