FDFF vs. SPCZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDFF (Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF) and SPCZ (RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FDFF returned -13.28% vs 4.96% for SPCZ. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDFF charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SPCZ.

Performance

FDFF vs. SPCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDFF achieves a -9.77% return, which is significantly lower than SPCZ's 1.51% return.

FDFF

• 1D: -2.74%
• 1M: -4.96%
• YTD: -9.77%
• 6M: -7.73%
• 1Y: -13.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPCZ

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: 1.61%
• 1Y: 4.96%
• 3Y*: 6.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDFF vs. SPCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	-9.77%	-2.75%	27.86%	15.99%
SPCZ RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF	1.51%	10.19%	5.31%	2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FDFF and SPCZ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023	0.06

FDFF vs. SPCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDFF	SPCZ
Financial Services	74.7%	81.4%
Technology	19.1%	0.4%
Industrials	3.4%	-
Real Estate	0.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FDFF vs. SPCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDFF

FDFF Risk / Return Rank: 3
FDFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FDFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FDFF Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FDFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FDFF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

SPCZ

SPCZ Risk / Return Rank: 23
SPCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
SPCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
SPCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 27
SPCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SPCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDFF vs. SPCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) and RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDFF	SPCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	0.64	-1.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.92	0.92	-1.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.18	-0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	1.30	-1.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	3.12	-4.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDFF vs. SPCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDFF Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the SPCZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDFF and SPCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDFF	SPCZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.73	0.64	-1.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	1.15	-0.66

Drawdowns

FDFF vs. SPCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDFF drawdown since its inception was -23.06%, which is greater than SPCZ's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFF and SPCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDFF	SPCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.06%	-4.47%	-18.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.31%	-3.82%	-18.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.05%	-1.54%	-16.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.32%	-0.51%	-5.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.82%	1.59%	+9.23%

Volatility

FDFF vs. SPCZ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ) at 0.64%. This indicates that FDFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDFF	SPCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	0.64%	+3.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.18%	6.29%	+7.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.21%	7.78%	+10.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.02%	5.59%	+13.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.02%	5.59%	+13.43%

FDFF vs. SPCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDFF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SPCZ's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDFF vs. SPCZ - Dividend Comparison

FDFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SPCZ's 11.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	1.01%	0.86%	0.70%	0.27%	0.00%
SPCZ RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF	11.88%	12.06%	4.24%	5.01%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDFF and SPCZ in my portfolio?

FDFF and SPCZ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDFF or SPCZ?

FDFF has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to SPCZ (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDFF dropped -23.06% vs SPCZ's -4.47%.

Which ETF is better, FDFF or SPCZ?

On 1-year performance, SPCZ leads with 4.96% vs -13.28% for FDFF. On fees, FDFF is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPCZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDFF or SPCZ?

Over the 1-year period, SPCZ has performed better with a 4.96% return vs -13.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDFF or SPCZ?

FDFF is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPCZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDFF or SPCZ?

SPCZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.88%, compared with 1.01% for FDFF.

What is the main difference between FDFF and SPCZ?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDFF and 0.90% for SPCZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.