FDFAX vs. XLP
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP).
FDFAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 28, 1985. XLP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Performance
FDFAX vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDFAX vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFAX Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio | 5.95% | -1.31% | -0.14% | 3.02% | -0.44% | 14.43% | 11.60% | 31.79% | -15.91% | 12.15% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 6.13% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDFAX having a 5.95% return and XLP slightly higher at 6.13%. Over the past 10 years, FDFAX has underperformed XLP with an annualized return of 5.17%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.17% annualized return.
FDFAX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 8.03%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 1.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.46%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
XLP
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 6.13%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- 3.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDFAX vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDFAX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDFAX vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
FDFAX
XLP
FDFAX vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDFAX | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.35 | 0.23 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.62 | 0.42 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.05 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.03 | 1.19 | -0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDFAX | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.23 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.50 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.49 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.44 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDFAX and XLP is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDFAX vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
FDFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than XLP's 2.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFAX Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio | 6.08% | 6.45% | 2.73% | 5.13% | 3.34% | 10.73% | 3.16% | 2.78% | 14.36% | 8.82% | 4.71% | 9.06% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.65% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
FDFAX vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDFAX drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFAX and XLP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDFAX | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -35.90% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -9.69% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.78% | -16.30% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.66% | -24.51% | -3.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.07% | -8.41% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -7.06% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 4.03% | +0.36% |
Volatility
FDFAX vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) have volatilities of 3.77% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDFAX | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 3.93% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 9.34% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 13.90% | +0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 13.14% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 14.69% | +0.27% |