FDFAX vs. XLP
FDFAX (Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FDFAX returned 5.86%/yr vs 7.20%/yr for XLP. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDFAX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
FDFAX vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDFAX achieves a 7.12% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FDFAX has underperformed XLP with an annualized return of 5.86%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.20% annualized return.
FDFAX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 7.12%
- 6M
- 5.44%
- 1Y
- 4.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.86%
XLP
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.20%
FDFAX vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFAX Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio | 7.12% | -1.31% | 5.58% | 3.02% | -0.44% | 14.43% | 11.60% | 31.79% | -15.91% | 12.15% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 6.36% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDFAX and XLP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FDFAX and XLP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDFAX vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDFAX
XLP
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
FDFAX
XLP
Industrials
FDFAX
XLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDFAX
XLP
Basic Materials
FDFAX
-
XLP
-
Communication Services
FDFAX
-
XLP
-
Energy
FDFAX
-
XLP
-
Financial Services
FDFAX
-
XLP
-
Healthcare
FDFAX
-
XLP
-
Real Estate
FDFAX
-
XLP
-
Technology
FDFAX
-
XLP
-
Utilities
FDFAX
-
XLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDFAX vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
FDFAX
XLP
FDFAX vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDFAX | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.04 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 0.20 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 0.40 | +0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDFAX | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.16 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.42 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.49 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.43 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
FDFAX vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDFAX drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFAX and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDFAX | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -35.90% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -9.69% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | -12.39% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.63% | -16.30% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.66% | -24.51% | -3.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.05% | -8.21% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -7.06% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 4.93% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FDFAX vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) have volatilities of 3.79% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDFAX | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 3.97% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | 9.86% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 12.66% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.79% | 13.29% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 14.73% | +0.20% |
FDFAX vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDFAX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDFAX vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
FDFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than XLP's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFAX Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio | 2.96% | 6.45% | 8.49% | 5.13% | 3.34% | 10.73% | 3.16% | 2.78% | 14.36% | 8.82% | 4.71% | 9.06% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.65% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FDFAX and XLP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XLP has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to FDFAX (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDFAX dropped -38.29% vs XLP's -35.90%.
FDFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDFAX and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer