PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDFAX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDFAX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDFAX achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly higher than FTIHX's 12.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FDFAX has underperformed FTIHX with an annualized return of 6.23%, while FTIHX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.23% annualized return.


FDFAX

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.16%
6M
5.13%
YTD
13.62%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
6.23%
ALL TIME*
11.39%

FTIHX

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.10%
6M
6.54%
YTD
12.93%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
9.23%
ALL TIME*
9.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FDFAX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDFAX
Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio
13.62%-1.31%5.58%3.02%-0.44%14.43%11.60%31.79%-15.91%12.15%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
12.93%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%25.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FDFAX and FTIHX is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between FDFAX and FTIHX has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDFAX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDFAX
FDFAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FDFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDFAX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDFAXFTIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.32

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.44

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.50

9.10

-6.60

FDFAX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDFAX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDFAX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDFAX drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than FTIHX's maximum drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFAX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDFAXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.29%

-35.75%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-11.25%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.45%

-13.15%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.63%

-29.99%

+14.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.66%

-35.75%

+8.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-2.40%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-7.14%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.06%

3.01%

+2.05%

Volatility

FDFAX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) at 5.18%. This indicates that FDFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDFAXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

5.18%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

14.23%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

16.06%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.12%

15.59%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

15.96%

-0.91%

FDFAX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDFAX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDFAX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FDFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than FTIHX's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDFAX
Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio
2.78%6.45%8.49%5.13%3.34%10.73%3.16%2.78%14.36%8.82%4.71%9.06%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.46%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDFAX and FTIHX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDFAX has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to FTIHX (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDFAX dropped -38.29% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FTIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDFAX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer