PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEGX vs. HAMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEGX vs. HAMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEGX achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than HAMVX's 16.29% return. Over the past 10 years, FDEGX has outperformed HAMVX with an annualized return of 12.24%, while HAMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.51% annualized return.


FDEGX

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.63%
YTD
11.31%
6M
0.13%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
12.24%

HAMVX

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.81%
YTD
16.29%
6M
17.55%
1Y
35.80%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEGX vs. HAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
11.31%2.88%26.57%20.93%-26.50%21.30%29.34%36.59%-6.92%21.03%
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
16.29%16.00%12.10%16.42%-5.63%29.93%-3.77%22.93%-17.82%12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEGX and HAMVX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2002

0.80

The correlation between FDEGX and HAMVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEGX vs. HAMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEGX
FDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

HAMVX
HAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEGX vs. HAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDEGXHAMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.46

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

5.13

-4.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.67

18.17

-17.50

FDEGX vs. HAMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the HAMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEGX and HAMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDEGXHAMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

2.61

-2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.56

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.48

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.40

0.00

Drawdowns

FDEGX vs. HAMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEGX drawdown since its inception was -85.96%, which is greater than HAMVX's maximum drawdown of -64.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEGX and HAMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEGXHAMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.96%

-64.17%

-21.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.45%

-6.84%

-13.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.04%

-21.04%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.62%

-21.04%

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.62%

-51.44%

+14.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.53%

-0.31%

-4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.82%

-9.98%

-26.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.00%

1.93%

+6.07%

Volatility

FDEGX vs. HAMVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) at 3.19%. This indicates that FDEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEGXHAMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

3.19%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.85%

9.24%

+9.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.95%

13.45%

+8.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.31%

18.83%

+4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.04%

21.89%

+0.15%

FDEGX vs. HAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEGX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than HAMVX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEGX vs. HAMVX - Dividend Comparison

FDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%7.89%0.05%0.00%14.15%8.37%3.65%0.75%0.05%0.59%0.13%
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
7.46%8.67%5.77%7.20%8.24%1.27%2.35%3.10%8.41%3.84%3.06%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDEGX and HAMVX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDEGX has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to HAMVX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEGX dropped -85.96% vs HAMVX's -64.17%.

HAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEGX and HAMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer