PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDD vs. FSZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDD vs. FSZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDD achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than FSZ's 2.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDD having a 10.75% annualized return and FSZ not far behind at 10.25%.


FDD

1D
-1.94%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
10.10%
6M
10.41%
1Y
30.12%
3Y*
26.20%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
10.75%

FSZ

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.06%
YTD
2.53%
6M
1.73%
1Y
11.07%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDD vs. FSZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
10.10%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.98%19.07%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.53%30.10%-1.85%21.30%-20.12%20.18%13.83%25.88%-15.22%31.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FDD and FSZ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.68

The correlation between FDD and FSZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDD vs. FSZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDD
FSZ

Financial Services

52.0%
22.0%

Industrials

13.3%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
7.3%

Energy

10.4%

-

Utilities

6.0%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.9%

Real Estate

3.3%
2.4%

Basic Materials

3.1%
9.8%

Communication Services

2.1%
2.4%

Healthcare

-

14.6%

Technology

-

4.9%

Financial Services

FDD
52.0%
FSZ
22.0%

Industrials

FDD
13.3%
FSZ
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FDD
12.3%
FSZ
7.3%

Energy

FDD
10.4%
FSZ

-

Utilities

FDD
6.0%
FSZ
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

FDD
3.6%
FSZ
4.9%

Real Estate

FDD
3.3%
FSZ
2.4%

Basic Materials

FDD
3.1%
FSZ
9.8%

Communication Services

FDD
2.1%
FSZ
2.4%

Healthcare

FDD

-

FSZ
14.6%

Technology

FDD

-

FSZ
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDD vs. FSZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FSZ
FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDD vs. FSZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDDFSZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.14

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

1.07

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.63

2.61

+8.02

FDD vs. FSZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the FSZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDD and FSZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDD vs. FSZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDD drawdown since its inception was -74.77%, which is greater than FSZ's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDD and FSZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDDFSZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.77%

-33.97%

-40.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-10.39%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.06%

-13.93%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

-33.96%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

-33.97%

-7.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-4.66%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.37%

-6.98%

-28.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

4.24%

-1.40%

Volatility

FDD vs. FSZ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) at 4.07%. This indicates that FDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDDFSZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

4.07%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

11.05%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

14.34%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

19.35%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

18.75%

+1.11%

FDD vs. FSZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDD has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FSZ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDD vs. FSZ - Dividend Comparison

FDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than FSZ's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
3.59%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.38%1.80%1.80%2.11%3.50%1.62%1.53%2.01%2.29%1.49%1.93%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDD and FSZ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to FSZ (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDD dropped -74.77% vs FSZ's -33.97%.

On 10-year performance, FDD leads with 10.75% vs 10.25% for FSZ. On fees, FDD is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FSZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDD has performed better with a 10.75% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDD is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.

FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 2.38% for FSZ.

FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30, while FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FDD and 0.80% for FSZ.

FDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDD and FSZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer