PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDCAX vs. VTMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDCAX vs. VTMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund (FDCAX) and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDCAX achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than VTMGX's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FDCAX has outperformed VTMGX with an annualized return of 16.39%, while VTMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.24% annualized return.


FDCAX

1D
-0.15%
1M
5.64%
YTD
16.79%
6M
17.41%
1Y
34.43%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*
16.39%

VTMGX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.03%
YTD
15.89%
6M
19.15%
1Y
33.58%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
10.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDCAX vs. VTMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDCAX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund
16.79%18.05%25.11%28.81%-21.23%23.85%33.92%30.15%-5.23%22.83%
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
15.89%35.17%3.03%17.65%-15.33%11.39%10.25%22.04%-14.48%26.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FDCAX and VTMGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1999

0.72

The correlation between FDCAX and VTMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDCAX vs. VTMGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDCAX
VTMGX

Technology

27.4%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
7.5%

Financial Services

11.5%
23.3%

Communication Services

11.0%
3.4%

Industrials

10.8%
19.2%

Energy

9.1%
5.4%

Healthcare

5.1%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.6%

Basic Materials

4.4%
7.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.7%

Utilities

1.3%
3.3%

Technology

FDCAX
27.4%
VTMGX
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FDCAX
12.8%
VTMGX
7.5%

Financial Services

FDCAX
11.5%
VTMGX
23.3%

Communication Services

FDCAX
11.0%
VTMGX
3.4%

Industrials

FDCAX
10.8%
VTMGX
19.2%

Energy

FDCAX
9.1%
VTMGX
5.4%

Healthcare

FDCAX
5.1%
VTMGX
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

FDCAX
4.8%
VTMGX
5.6%

Basic Materials

FDCAX
4.4%
VTMGX
7.5%

Real Estate

FDCAX
1.7%
VTMGX
2.7%

Utilities

FDCAX
1.3%
VTMGX
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDCAX vs. VTMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDCAX
FDCAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FDCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMGX
VTMGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VTMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDCAX vs. VTMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund (FDCAX) and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDCAXVTMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

2.81

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.79

10.88

+2.91

FDCAX vs. VTMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the VTMGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDCAX and VTMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDCAXVTMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.17

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.63

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.62

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.31

+0.30

Drawdowns

FDCAX vs. VTMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCAX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, roughly equal to the maximum VTMGX drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCAX and VTMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDCAXVTMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.53%

-60.58%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-11.67%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.68%

-13.18%

-16.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.68%

-29.71%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.06%

-35.68%

+2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.91%

-14.66%

+4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

3.01%

-0.44%

Volatility

FDCAX vs. VTMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund (FDCAX) is 4.27%, while Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that FDCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDCAXVTMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

4.97%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

12.53%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.47%

15.11%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

15.87%

+5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

16.54%

+4.06%

FDCAX vs. VTMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMGX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDCAX vs. VTMGX - Dividend Comparison

FDCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than VTMGX's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDCAX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund
6.82%7.96%18.33%3.33%9.32%16.76%8.38%13.50%13.29%10.43%5.62%12.38%
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.58%3.20%3.34%3.14%2.88%3.14%2.02%3.03%3.33%2.77%3.06%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDCAX and VTMGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTMGX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to FDCAX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDCAX dropped -58.53% vs VTMGX's -60.58%.

FDCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDCAX and VTMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer