PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDCAX vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDCAX vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund (FDCAX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDCAX achieves a 16.97% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FDCAX has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 16.41%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.77% annualized return.


FDCAX

1D
0.62%
1M
5.82%
YTD
16.97%
6M
17.82%
1Y
35.48%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
14.42%
10Y*
16.41%

SCHD

1D
0.59%
1M
1.60%
YTD
19.01%
6M
20.36%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDCAX vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDCAX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund
16.97%18.05%25.11%28.81%-21.23%23.85%33.92%30.15%-5.23%22.83%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FDCAX and SCHD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between FDCAX and SCHD has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDCAX vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDCAX
SCHD

Technology

27.4%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
6.3%

Financial Services

11.5%
9.3%

Communication Services

11.0%
6.3%

Industrials

10.8%
7.5%

Energy

9.1%
16.2%

Healthcare

5.1%
18.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
19.2%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Utilities

1.3%
0.0%

Technology

FDCAX
27.4%
SCHD
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDCAX
12.8%
SCHD
6.3%

Financial Services

FDCAX
11.5%
SCHD
9.3%

Communication Services

FDCAX
11.0%
SCHD
6.3%

Industrials

FDCAX
10.8%
SCHD
7.5%

Energy

FDCAX
9.1%
SCHD
16.2%

Healthcare

FDCAX
5.1%
SCHD
18.8%

Consumer Defensive

FDCAX
4.8%
SCHD
19.2%

Basic Materials

FDCAX
4.4%
SCHD
1.2%

Real Estate

FDCAX
1.7%
SCHD

-

Utilities

FDCAX
1.3%
SCHD
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDCAX vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDCAX
FDCAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FDCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FDCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDCAX vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund (FDCAX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDCAXSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

2.57

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.30

3.98

-0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

6.17

-2.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.05

15.20

-1.15

FDCAX vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDCAX and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDCAXSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.57

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.59

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.77

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.86

-0.25

Drawdowns

FDCAX vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCAX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCAX and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDCAXSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.53%

-33.37%

-25.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-4.61%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.68%

-16.13%

-13.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.68%

-16.85%

-12.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.06%

-33.37%

+0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.40%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.91%

-3.32%

-6.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.87%

+0.70%

Volatility

FDCAX vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund (FDCAX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.92%. This indicates that FDCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDCAXSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

2.92%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

7.66%

+3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

10.96%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

14.38%

+6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

16.72%

+3.88%

FDCAX vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDCAX vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FDCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDCAX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund
6.81%7.96%18.33%3.33%9.32%16.76%8.38%13.50%13.29%10.43%5.62%12.38%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDCAX and SCHD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDCAX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to SCHD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDCAX dropped -58.53% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDCAX and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer