PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDCAX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDCAX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund (FDCAX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDCAX achieves a 13.82% return, which is significantly higher than FNILX's 7.91% return.


FDCAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
13.82%
6M
12.58%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
23.35%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
16.81%

FNILX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
7.91%
6M
6.60%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDCAX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDCAX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund
13.82%18.05%25.11%28.81%-21.23%23.85%33.92%30.15%-16.93%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
7.91%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FDCAX and FNILX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.96

The correlation between FDCAX and FNILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDCAX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDCAX
FDCAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FDCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FDCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDCAX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund (FDCAX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDCAXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.43

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.73

10.65

+0.08

FDCAX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDCAX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDCAX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCAX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than FNILX's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCAX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDCAXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.53%

-33.76%

-24.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-9.01%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.68%

-19.08%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.68%

-25.40%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-3.27%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-5.34%

-4.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.05%

+0.60%

Volatility

FDCAX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund (FDCAX) has a higher volatility of 7.25% compared to Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) at 5.03%. This indicates that FDCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDCAXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.25%

5.03%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

9.96%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.84%

12.65%

+3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

17.36%

+3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.65%

20.03%

+0.62%

FDCAX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDCAX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FDCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than FNILX's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDCAX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund
7.00%7.96%18.33%3.33%9.32%16.76%8.38%13.50%13.29%10.43%5.62%12.38%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.94%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FDCAX and FNILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDCAX has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to FNILX (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDCAX dropped -58.53% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FDCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDCAX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer