FDAFX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A (FDAFX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FDAFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 24, 2003. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FDAFX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDAFX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDAFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A | -1.61% | 14.28% | 6.79% | 12.08% | -16.22% | 8.40% | 13.09% | 18.40% | -5.05% | 12.05% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | -1.94% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDAFX achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's -1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FDAFX has underperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 6.33%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.65% annualized return.
FDAFX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 10.37%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 6.33%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDAFX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDAFX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDAFX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FDAFX
FSPSX
FDAFX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A (FDAFX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDAFX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 1.11 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 1.56 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.54 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.89 | 5.93 | +0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDAFX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 1.11 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.51 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.53 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.46 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDAFX and FSPSX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDAFX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FDAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, more than FSPSX's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDAFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A | 7.82% | 7.70% | 4.66% | 2.15% | 8.84% | 10.71% | 6.97% | 6.62% | 9.48% | 3.23% | 4.34% | 3.51% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FDAFX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDAFX drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAFX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDAFX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.38% | -33.69% | -13.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.07% | -11.39% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -29.41% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.75% | -33.69% | +10.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.42% | -10.86% | +5.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -6.59% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 2.96% | -1.52% |
Volatility
FDAFX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class A (FDAFX) is 3.22%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that FDAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDAFX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 7.04% | -3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.99% | 10.63% | -5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.23% | 16.79% | -8.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.79% | 15.77% | -6.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.04% | 16.47% | -7.43% |