FDAAX vs. EIFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX).
FDAAX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 30, 2001. EIFAX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 16, 2008.
Performance
FDAAX vs. EIFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDAAX vs. EIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDAAX Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund | -1.20% | 4.68% | 8.52% | 14.35% | -1.37% | 8.55% | -3.71% | 3.30% | 0.95% | 2.44% |
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund | -1.88% | 4.54% | 8.91% | 11.86% | -2.98% | 5.41% | 1.90% | 9.02% | 0.28% | 5.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDAAX achieves a -1.20% return, which is significantly higher than EIFAX's -1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FDAAX has underperformed EIFAX with an annualized return of 4.52%, while EIFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.15% annualized return.
FDAAX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- -1.20%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- 3.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
EIFAX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- 5.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDAAX vs. EIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDAAX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than EIFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDAAX vs. EIFAX — Risk / Return Rank
FDAAX
EIFAX
FDAAX vs. EIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDAAX | EIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.82 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.20 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.22 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | 3.93 | +1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDAAX | EIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.82 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.85 | 1.50 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.18 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 1.17 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDAAX and EIFAX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FDAAX vs. EIFAX - Dividend Comparison
FDAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, which matches EIFAX's 7.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDAAX Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund | 7.40% | 8.00% | 9.42% | 7.64% | 5.84% | 3.73% | 5.07% | 5.62% | 5.18% | 3.79% | 4.57% | 4.71% |
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund | 7.40% | 8.09% | 8.91% | 7.02% | 5.92% | 4.03% | 4.51% | 5.58% | 5.10% | 4.46% | 5.02% | 5.29% |
Drawdowns
FDAAX vs. EIFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDAAX drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, smaller than the maximum EIFAX drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAAX and EIFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDAAX | EIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -40.28% | +14.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.13% | -2.45% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.22% | -7.63% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.08% | -24.22% | +6.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -2.18% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -2.28% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.79% | -0.11% |
Volatility
FDAAX vs. EIFAX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) at 0.85%. This indicates that FDAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDAAX | EIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 0.85% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.36% | 1.83% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 3.31% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 3.10% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.83% | 4.45% | -0.62% |