PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDAAX vs. DAFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDAAX vs. DAFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) and Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDAAX achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than DAFRX's 2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FDAAX has outperformed DAFRX with an annualized return of 4.26%, while DAFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.90% annualized return.


FDAAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
6M
1.47%
YTD
1.38%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
4.26%
ALL TIME*
3.87%

DAFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
6M
2.26%
YTD
2.36%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
3.90%
ALL TIME*
3.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FDAAX vs. DAFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDAAX
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund
1.38%4.68%8.52%14.35%-1.37%8.55%-3.71%3.30%0.95%2.44%
DAFRX
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund
2.36%5.04%7.26%13.05%-2.54%3.51%-0.09%7.18%-1.06%2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FDAAX and DAFRX is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2013

0.45

The correlation between FDAAX and DAFRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDAAX vs. DAFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDAAX
FDAAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FDAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FDAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DAFRX
DAFRX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DAFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DAFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDAAX vs. DAFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) and Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDAAXDAFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.32

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

7.46

-2.58

FDAAX vs. DAFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDAAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the DAFRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDAAX and DAFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDAAX vs. DAFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDAAX drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, which is greater than DAFRX's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAAX and DAFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDAAXDAFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.74%

-19.42%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-1.45%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.70%

-3.34%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.22%

-7.08%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.08%

-19.42%

+1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.12%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-0.96%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

0.45%

+0.16%

Volatility

FDAAX vs. DAFRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) is 0.34%, while Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund (DAFRX) has a volatility of 0.36%. This indicates that FDAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDAAXDAFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

0.36%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.08%

1.30%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01%

1.69%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.35%

2.25%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.85%

3.38%

+0.47%

FDAAX vs. DAFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDAAX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than DAFRX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDAAX vs. DAFRX - Dividend Comparison

FDAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than DAFRX's 6.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAFRX
Dunham Floating Rate Bond Fund
6.75%7.26%7.87%8.91%5.76%3.13%3.27%4.36%4.30%3.31%3.01%3.13%
FDAAX
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund
7.24%8.00%9.42%7.64%5.84%3.73%5.07%5.62%5.18%3.79%4.57%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDAAX and DAFRX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAFRX has higher volatility (0.36%) compared to FDAAX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDAAX dropped -25.74% vs DAFRX's -19.42%.

DAFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDAAX and DAFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer