FCYIX vs. GWPAX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FCYIX (Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio) and GWPAX (American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A) are both mutual funds - FCYIX is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while GWPAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by American Funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCYIX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for GWPAX.

Performance

FCYIX vs. GWPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio (FCYIX) and American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FCYIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GWPAX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 1.84%
• 6M: 7.08%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 1Y: 20.42%
• 3Y*: 20.44%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 13.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCYIX vs. GWPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCYIX Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio	0.00%	20.95%	23.32%	23.21%	-10.47%	16.94%	11.91%	28.02%	-15.34%	19.87%
GWPAX American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A	10.74%	20.47%	20.17%	28.76%	-26.97%	18.59%	25.34%	27.19%	-6.59%	25.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FCYIX and GWPAX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between FCYIX and GWPAX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FCYIX vs. GWPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCYIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GWPAX

GWPAX Risk / Return Rank: 36
GWPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GWPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
GWPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GWPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
GWPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCYIX vs. GWPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio (FCYIX) and American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCYIX	GWPAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.30	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.84	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.69	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.26	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FCYIX	GWPAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-34.15%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.78%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.15%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.80%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.68%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.73%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FCYIX	GWPAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.70%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.34%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	18.43%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.00%	—

FCYIX vs. GWPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCYIX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than GWPAX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCYIX vs. GWPAX - Dividend Comparison

FCYIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GWPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCYIX Fidelity Select Industrials Portfolio	1.58%	2.26%	4.30%	5.86%	3.94%	27.55%	2.89%	4.16%	9.54%	5.06%	4.32%	6.61%
GWPAX American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A	5.19%	5.75%	5.83%	1.61%	9.94%	3.42%	3.42%	5.77%	6.19%	3.39%	4.36%	4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCYIX and GWPAX in my portfolio?

FCYIX and GWPAX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.