FCX vs. AMLP
FCX (Freeport-McMoRan Inc.) is a stock, while AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Over the past 10 years, FCX returned 22.12%/yr vs 6.92%/yr for AMLP. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FCX vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCX achieves a 35.32% return, which is significantly higher than AMLP's 15.29% return. Over the past 10 years, FCX has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 22.12%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.92% annualized return.
FCX
- 1D
- 3.12%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 35.32%
- 6M
- 45.06%
- 1Y
- 68.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 22.12%
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 14.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
FCX vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 35.32% | 35.41% | -9.41% | 13.69% | -7.91% | 61.41% | 99.06% | 29.59% | -45.11% | 43.75% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 15.29% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCX and AMLP is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FCX and AMLP has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCX vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
FCX
AMLP
FCX vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCX | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 1.66 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 5.35 | +1.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCX vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCX drawdown since its inception was -92.52%, which is greater than AMLP's maximum drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCX and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCX | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.52% | -77.19% | -15.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.90% | -8.94% | -15.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.34% | -14.27% | -32.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.47% | -20.92% | -30.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.59% | -72.62% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -4.94% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -17.37% | -22.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.97% | 2.77% | +7.20% |
Volatility
FCX vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) has a higher volatility of 17.98% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 4.71%. This indicates that FCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCX | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.98% | 4.71% | +13.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.53% | 8.77% | +28.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.88% | 11.84% | +37.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.14% | 19.95% | +25.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.65% | 27.67% | +20.98% |
Dividends
FCX vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
FCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than AMLP's 7.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.71% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 0.88% | 1.18% | 1.58% | 1.41% | 0.99% | 0.54% | 0.19% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCX and AMLP have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCX has higher volatility (17.98%) compared to AMLP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCX dropped -92.52% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
FCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCX and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer