FCVTX vs. PRVIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX).
FCVTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. PRVIX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2015.
Performance
FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCVTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M | -0.99% | 7.53% | 7.42% | 17.19% | -13.53% | 37.49% | 10.60% | 20.19% | -15.58% | 11.68% |
PRVIX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I | 1.00% | 21.38% | 10.96% | 12.46% | -18.42% | 25.60% | 12.58% | 25.95% | -11.49% | 12.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCVTX achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than PRVIX's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVTX has underperformed PRVIX with an annualized return of 8.78%, while PRVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.74% annualized return.
FCVTX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -8.95%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 13.06%
- 3Y*
- 9.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
PRVIX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 15.65%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCVTX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PRVIX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCVTX vs. PRVIX — Risk / Return Rank
FCVTX
PRVIX
FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCVTX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 1.30 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 2.08 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.28 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 1.93 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 8.07 | -5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCVTX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 1.30 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.34 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.51 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.50 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCVTX and PRVIX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Dividend Comparison
FCVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%, less than PRVIX's 22.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCVTX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M | 10.80% | 10.69% | 4.91% | 5.34% | 6.37% | 8.00% | 0.23% | 3.20% | 38.15% | 3.30% | 6.98% | 11.13% |
PRVIX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I | 22.88% | 23.11% | 9.96% | 3.40% | 5.54% | 7.15% | 2.12% | 4.72% | 9.61% | 3.79% | 3.88% | 22.61% |
Drawdowns
FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCVTX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, which is greater than PRVIX's maximum drawdown of -40.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVTX and PRVIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCVTX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.26% | -40.95% | -17.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.42% | -14.06% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.91% | -28.00% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.83% | -40.95% | -3.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.40% | -8.14% | -2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -8.44% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 3.65% | +0.23% |
Volatility
FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) is 5.52%, while T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that FCVTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCVTX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 6.11% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 15.98% | -4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 23.85% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 20.43% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 21.29% | +0.97% |