PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVTX vs. PRVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVTX achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than PRVIX's 17.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCVTX having a 10.44% annualized return and PRVIX not far ahead at 10.74%.


FCVTX

1D
1.98%
1M
4.24%
YTD
18.92%
6M
16.45%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
10.44%

PRVIX

1D
1.15%
1M
3.65%
YTD
17.26%
6M
16.21%
1Y
32.84%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVTX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M
18.92%7.53%7.42%17.19%-13.53%37.49%10.60%20.19%-15.58%11.68%
PRVIX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I
17.26%8.44%10.96%12.46%-18.42%25.60%12.58%25.95%-11.49%12.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVTX and PRVIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2015

0.95

The correlation between FCVTX and PRVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVTX vs. PRVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVTX
FCVTX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FCVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PRVIX
PRVIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PRVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCVTXPRVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

4.02

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

15.00

-2.67

FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the PRVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVTX and PRVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCVTXPRVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.15

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.33

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.51

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.52

-0.08

Drawdowns

FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVTX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, which is greater than PRVIX's maximum drawdown of -40.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVTX and PRVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVTXPRVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.26%

-40.95%

-17.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-8.93%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.91%

-24.57%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

-28.00%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

-40.95%

-3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-8.33%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.36%

+0.63%

Volatility

FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX) at 4.48%. This indicates that FCVTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVTXPRVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

4.48%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

12.31%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

16.73%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

19.84%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

21.06%

+1.30%

FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVTX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PRVIX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVTX vs. PRVIX - Dividend Comparison

FCVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.99%, less than PRVIX's 10.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVTX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M
8.99%10.69%4.91%5.34%6.37%8.00%0.23%3.20%38.15%3.30%6.98%11.13%
PRVIX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I
10.33%12.11%9.96%3.40%5.54%7.15%2.12%4.72%9.61%3.79%3.88%22.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FCVTX and PRVIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCVTX has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to PRVIX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVTX dropped -58.26% vs PRVIX's -40.95%.

PRVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVTX and PRVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer