PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVTX vs. BRSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVTX vs. BRSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVTX achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly higher than BRSIX's 16.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVTX has outperformed BRSIX with an annualized return of 10.37%, while BRSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.


FCVTX

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.19%
YTD
18.26%
6M
15.99%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
10.37%

BRSIX

1D
-2.93%
1M
1.19%
YTD
16.60%
6M
17.63%
1Y
54.50%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
-0.55%
10Y*
8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVTX vs. BRSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVTX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M
18.26%7.53%7.42%17.19%-13.53%37.49%10.60%20.19%-15.58%11.68%
BRSIX
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund
16.60%20.09%14.92%11.46%-23.43%-1.93%25.50%15.34%-17.23%12.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVTX and BRSIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2004

0.86

The correlation between FCVTX and BRSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVTX vs. BRSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVTX
FCVTX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FCVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BRSIX
BRSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BRSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BRSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVTX vs. BRSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCVTXBRSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

4.83

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

14.83

-3.65

FCVTX vs. BRSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the BRSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVTX and BRSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCVTXBRSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.35

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

-0.02

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.34

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.44

0.00

Drawdowns

FCVTX vs. BRSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVTX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, smaller than the maximum BRSIX drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVTX and BRSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVTXBRSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.26%

-61.79%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-11.46%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.91%

-30.80%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

-53.66%

+28.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

-54.09%

+9.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-5.30%

+4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-15.63%

+7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.72%

-0.73%

Volatility

FCVTX vs. BRSIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M (FCVTX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX) have volatilities of 5.97% and 6.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVTXBRSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

6.26%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

15.45%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

23.63%

-5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

24.46%

-3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

24.12%

-1.76%

FCVTX vs. BRSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVTX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BRSIX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVTX vs. BRSIX - Dividend Comparison

FCVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.04%, more than BRSIX's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRSIX
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund
0.88%1.03%0.62%0.89%2.12%1.32%3.46%1.30%16.12%13.71%8.25%12.77%
FCVTX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class M
9.04%10.69%4.91%5.34%6.37%8.00%0.23%3.20%38.15%3.30%6.98%11.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCVTX and BRSIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRSIX has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to FCVTX (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVTX dropped -58.26% vs BRSIX's -61.79%.

BRSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVTX and BRSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer