PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVT vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVT vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVT achieves a 25.61% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVT has outperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 12.36%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.13% annualized return.


FCVT

1D
-1.20%
1M
7.08%
YTD
25.61%
6M
25.00%
1Y
47.07%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
12.36%

NFTY

1D
-1.34%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
-9.70%
6M
-7.99%
1Y
-8.48%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVT vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
25.61%19.60%11.92%7.12%-20.88%4.23%51.02%22.30%-2.28%12.66%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-9.70%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVT and NFTY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2015

0.28

FCVT vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCVT
NFTY

Utilities

1.3%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
16.3%

Financial Services

0.7%
21.2%

Healthcare

0.7%
9.7%

Basic Materials

-

12.5%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.3%

Energy

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

9.2%

Utilities

FCVT
1.3%
NFTY
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FCVT
0.7%
NFTY
16.3%

Financial Services

FCVT
0.7%
NFTY
21.2%

Healthcare

FCVT
0.7%
NFTY
9.7%

Basic Materials

FCVT

-

NFTY
12.5%

Communication Services

FCVT

-

NFTY
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

FCVT

-

NFTY
8.3%

Energy

FCVT

-

NFTY
8.5%

Industrials

FCVT

-

NFTY
8.3%

Real Estate

FCVT

-

NFTY

-

Technology

FCVT

-

NFTY
9.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVT vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVT
FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVT vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCVTNFTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.97

-0.58

+3.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

-0.78

+4.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

0.91

+0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.58

-0.53

+6.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.90

-1.39

+22.28

FCVT vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVT and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCVTNFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

-0.58

+3.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.27

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.39

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.28

+0.40

Drawdowns

FCVT vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVT drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVT and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVTNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.79%

-47.67%

+15.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-16.14%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-21.55%

+6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.43%

-21.55%

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.79%

-47.67%

+15.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-17.45%

+16.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.36%

-9.58%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

6.12%

-3.86%

Volatility

FCVT vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 4.58%. This indicates that FCVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVTNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

4.58%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.99%

12.57%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

14.72%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.09%

17.39%

-3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.85%

20.72%

-5.87%

FCVT vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVT vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

FCVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than NFTY's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
1.19%1.98%1.30%1.76%3.71%23.07%1.72%1.60%1.85%2.18%1.88%0.59%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.96%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCVT and NFTY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCVT has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to NFTY (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVT dropped -31.79% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 10-year performance, FCVT leads with 12.36% vs 8.13% for NFTY. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FCVT has performed better with a 12.36% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.19% for FCVT.

FCVT is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FCVT and 0.80% for NFTY.

FCVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVT and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer