PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVSX vs. HSTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVSX vs. HSTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) and Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVSX achieves a 25.40% return, which is significantly higher than HSTRX's 4.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVSX has outperformed HSTRX with an annualized return of 12.91%, while HSTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.19% annualized return.


FCVSX

1D
1.13%
1M
7.40%
YTD
25.40%
6M
14.56%
1Y
32.57%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
12.91%

HSTRX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.29%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.60%
1Y
15.23%
3Y*
11.29%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
5.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVSX vs. HSTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVSX
Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund
25.40%8.52%13.91%11.42%-15.33%9.95%42.52%28.58%-1.29%9.03%
HSTRX
Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund
4.14%20.33%6.06%6.04%-6.23%1.21%11.45%11.42%1.48%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVSX and HSTRX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2002

0.22

The correlation between FCVSX and HSTRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVSX vs. HSTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVSX
FCVSX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FCVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

HSTRX
HSTRX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HSTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HSTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVSX vs. HSTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) and Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCVSXHSTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.61

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

6.26

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.79

17.32

-7.53

FCVSX vs. HSTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the HSTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVSX and HSTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCVSXHSTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.94

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.89

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.88

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.86

-0.13

Drawdowns

FCVSX vs. HSTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVSX drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, which is greater than HSTRX's maximum drawdown of -13.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVSX and HSTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVSXHSTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.76%

-13.53%

-45.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-2.42%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.56%

-4.24%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-13.53%

-10.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.08%

-13.53%

-11.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.08%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-2.69%

-4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

0.87%

+2.57%

Volatility

FCVSX vs. HSTRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX) at 1.08%. This indicates that FCVSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVSXHSTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

1.08%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.34%

2.45%

+12.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.51%

5.20%

+12.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

6.42%

+7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.86%

5.90%

+7.96%

FCVSX vs. HSTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVSX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than HSTRX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVSX vs. HSTRX - Dividend Comparison

FCVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than HSTRX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVSX
Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund
1.46%2.21%7.47%2.13%3.78%20.64%10.75%3.28%9.86%4.11%4.90%10.41%
HSTRX
Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund
2.36%2.25%2.91%2.54%2.15%1.33%0.52%1.29%1.20%0.37%0.25%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCVSX and HSTRX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCVSX has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to HSTRX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVSX dropped -58.76% vs HSTRX's -13.53%.

HSTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVSX and HSTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer