PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVSX vs. FTCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVSX vs. FTCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCVSX having a 25.40% return and FTCVX slightly lower at 25.12%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCVSX having a 12.91% annualized return and FTCVX not far behind at 12.86%.


FCVSX

1D
1.13%
1M
7.40%
YTD
25.40%
6M
14.56%
1Y
32.57%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
12.91%

FTCVX

1D
1.14%
1M
7.34%
YTD
25.12%
6M
24.55%
1Y
43.73%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
12.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVSX vs. FTCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVSX
Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund
25.40%8.52%13.91%11.42%-15.33%9.95%42.52%28.58%-1.29%9.03%
FTCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M
25.12%17.67%7.70%12.42%-15.82%9.35%41.70%27.83%-1.88%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVSX and FTCVX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009

1.00

The correlation between FCVSX and FTCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVSX vs. FTCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVSX
FCVSX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FCVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FTCVX
FTCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FTCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVSX vs. FTCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCVSXFTCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.52

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

6.27

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.79

24.46

-14.67

FCVSX vs. FTCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the FTCVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVSX and FTCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCVSXFTCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

3.03

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.70

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.94

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.00

-0.26

Drawdowns

FCVSX vs. FTCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVSX drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, which is greater than FTCVX's maximum drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVSX and FTCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVSXFTCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.76%

-25.10%

-33.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-7.16%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.56%

-18.91%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-24.45%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.08%

-25.10%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-5.85%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

1.83%

+1.61%

Volatility

FCVSX vs. FTCVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M (FTCVX) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVSXFTCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

4.87%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.34%

11.86%

+3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.51%

14.85%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

13.49%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.86%

13.66%

+0.20%

FCVSX vs. FTCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVSX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVSX vs. FTCVX - Dividend Comparison

FCVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than FTCVX's 8.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVSX
Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund
1.46%2.21%7.47%2.13%3.78%20.64%10.75%3.28%9.86%4.11%4.90%10.41%
FTCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class M
8.41%10.89%1.66%3.03%3.18%20.07%10.32%2.74%9.06%3.78%4.32%9.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FCVSX and FTCVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTCVX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to FCVSX (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVSX dropped -58.76% vs FTCVX's -25.10%.

FTCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVSX and FTCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer