PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVIX vs. DLDRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVIX vs. DLDRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I (FCVIX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVIX achieves a 19.20% return, which is significantly lower than DLDRX's 25.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVIX has underperformed DLDRX with an annualized return of 11.10%, while DLDRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.07% annualized return.


FCVIX

1D
1.97%
1M
4.29%
YTD
19.20%
6M
16.74%
1Y
34.71%
3Y*
17.29%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
11.10%

DLDRX

1D
1.00%
1M
1.07%
YTD
25.52%
6M
30.23%
1Y
53.26%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
15.77%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVIX vs. DLDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVIX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I
19.20%8.02%9.36%17.82%-13.07%38.10%11.21%20.76%-15.42%12.27%
DLDRX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund
25.52%15.04%0.81%1.58%34.18%38.30%6.58%16.64%-17.57%14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVIX and DLDRX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2004

0.70

The correlation between FCVIX and DLDRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVIX vs. DLDRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVIX
FCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DLDRX
DLDRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DLDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DLDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVIX vs. DLDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I (FCVIX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCVIXDLDRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

3.05

-0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.11

3.89

-0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.50

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

7.18

-3.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.66

22.68

-10.02

FCVIX vs. DLDRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the DLDRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVIX and DLDRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCVIXDLDRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

3.05

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.62

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.55

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.40

+0.06

Drawdowns

FCVIX vs. DLDRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVIX drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, smaller than the maximum DLDRX drawdown of -69.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVIX and DLDRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVIXDLDRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.61%

-69.13%

+11.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-7.49%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.82%

-32.44%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

-32.44%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.61%

-54.24%

+9.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-1.19%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-20.77%

+12.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.37%

+0.59%

Volatility

FCVIX vs. DLDRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I (FCVIX) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) at 4.36%. This indicates that FCVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLDRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVIXDLDRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

4.36%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.76%

13.42%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

18.11%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

25.64%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

25.49%

-3.14%

FCVIX vs. DLDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DLDRX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVIX vs. DLDRX - Dividend Comparison

FCVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, more than DLDRX's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLDRX
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund
1.86%2.33%7.45%12.42%9.66%5.07%1.11%2.16%1.87%0.63%1.44%1.25%
FCVIX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class I
8.47%10.10%6.09%5.19%5.92%7.96%0.48%3.49%36.40%3.65%7.15%11.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCVIX and DLDRX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCVIX has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to DLDRX (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVIX dropped -57.61% vs DLDRX's -69.13%.

DLDRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVIX and DLDRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer