FCVFX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCVFX (Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FCVFX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FCVFX returned 12.38%/yr vs 21.88%/yr for FBGRX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCVFX charges 1.90%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FCVFX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C (FCVFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVFX achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 18.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVFX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 12.38%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.88% annualized return.

FCVFX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 3.39%
• YTD: 16.20%
• 6M: 17.37%
• 1Y: 33.21%
• 3Y*: 22.88%
• 5Y*: 11.97%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 9.10%
• YTD: 18.56%
• 6M: 19.76%
• 1Y: 44.98%
• 3Y*: 32.54%
• 5Y*: 17.08%
• 10Y*: 21.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVFX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C	16.20%	10.14%	24.29%	18.53%	-10.07%	33.72%	8.57%	30.36%	-18.65%	14.05%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	18.56%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVFX and FBGRX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2003	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between FCVFX and FBGRX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FCVFX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVFX

FCVFX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FCVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FCVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FCVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FCVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FCVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVFX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C (FCVFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCVFX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.67	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.41	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.45	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	3.67	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.01	15.56	-2.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCVFX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVFX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCVFX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.67	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.69	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.93	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.68	-0.26

Drawdowns

FCVFX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVFX drawdown since its inception was -65.18%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVFX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCVFX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.18%	-58.64%	-6.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.99%	-12.65%	+2.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.74%	-27.07%	+5.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.11%	-43.08%	+19.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.67%	-43.08%	-5.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.06%	-12.53%	+3.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	2.98%	-0.26%

Volatility

FCVFX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C (FCVFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) have volatilities of 4.17% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCVFX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	4.14%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.42%	13.00%	-1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.09%	17.44%	-1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.31%	24.88%	-3.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.56%	23.69%	-1.13%

FCVFX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVFX has a 1.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVFX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FCVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.60%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FCVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class C	7.07%	8.22%	25.20%	0.12%	0.00%	4.16%	0.00%	2.46%	14.34%	2.34%	0.00%	1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCVFX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FCVFX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCVFX or FBGRX?

FCVFX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to FBGRX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVFX dropped -65.18% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.