FCVCX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FCVCX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FCVCX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FCVCX returned 10.40%/yr vs 22.23%/yr for FBGRX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCVCX charges 2.02%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FCVCX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C (FCVCX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVCX achieves a 22.88% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 19.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVCX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 10.40%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.23% annualized return.

FCVCX

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: 5.01%
• YTD: 22.88%
• 6M: 20.12%
• 1Y: 38.99%
• 3Y*: 16.00%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

FBGRX

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: 4.78%
• YTD: 19.05%
• 6M: 18.64%
• 1Y: 44.33%
• 3Y*: 31.24%
• 5Y*: 16.32%
• 10Y*: 22.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVCX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCVCX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C	22.88%	6.93%	6.82%	16.65%	-13.97%	36.71%	9.98%	19.64%	-16.02%	11.11%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	19.05%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVCX and FBGRX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004	0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between FCVCX and FBGRX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FCVCX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVCX

FCVCX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FCVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FCVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FCVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FCVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FCVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVCX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C (FCVCX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCVCX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.34	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.03	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.40	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	3.46	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.02	14.31	-1.29

FCVCX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVCX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCVCX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVCX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVCX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCVCX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.55%	-58.64%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.45%	-12.65%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.11%	-27.07%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.11%	-43.08%	+17.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.31%	-43.08%	-2.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.34%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.46%	-12.52%	+4.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	3.06%	-0.06%

Volatility

FCVCX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C (FCVCX) is 6.13%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that FCVCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCVCX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.13%	7.86%	-1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.44%	14.72%	-1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.16%	18.71%	-0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.98%	25.07%	-4.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.41%	23.78%	-1.37%

FCVCX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVCX has a 2.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVCX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FCVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.60%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FCVCX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C	10.05%	12.35%	5.46%	5.97%	7.23%	8.53%	0.13%	3.34%	41.61%	3.03%	7.26%	11.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCVCX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FCVCX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCVCX or FBGRX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to FCVCX (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVCX dropped -58.55% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.