FCUV.TO vs. SPMO

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FCUV.TO (Fidelity U.S. Value ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCUV.TO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCUV.TO returned 21.29%/yr vs 25.00%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCUV.TO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.

Performance

FCUV.TO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FCUV.TO is traded in CAD, while SPMO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUV.TO achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 32.94% return.

FCUV.TO

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 4.27%
• 6M: 13.74%
• YTD: 18.61%
• 1Y: 34.93%
• 3Y*: 25.82%
• 5Y*: 21.29%
• 10Y*: —

SPMO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: 1.68%
• 6M: 30.32%
• YTD: 32.94%
• 1Y: 40.99%
• 3Y*: 45.17%
• 5Y*: 25.00%
• 10Y*: 22.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUV.TO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCUV.TO Fidelity U.S. Value ETF	18.61%	14.83%	35.81%	19.99%	2.58%	38.13%	13.42%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	32.94%	20.80%	58.16%	14.76%	-4.78%	22.58%	15.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUV.TO and SPMO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020	0.49

The correlation between FCUV.TO and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCUV.TO vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCUV.TO	SPMO
Technology	27.2%	55.0%
Financial Services	17.2%	5.7%
Industrials	14.6%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	1.1%
Basic Materials	9.1%	1.8%
Utilities	8.4%	2.7%
Healthcare	3.3%	6.6%
Communication Services	3.0%	8.1%
Real Estate	1.5%	1.0%
Energy	0.0%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.9%

Return for Risk

FCUV.TO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUV.TO

FCUV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 90
FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FCUV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FCUV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FCUV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FCUV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

SPMO

SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 65
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUV.TO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCUV.TO	SPMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.83	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	2.45	+0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.33	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.24	3.18	+2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.62	10.10	+7.52

FCUV.TO vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUV.TO and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCUV.TO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUV.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -26.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUV.TO and SPMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCUV.TO	SPMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.47%	-26.80%	+10.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-12.95%	+6.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.47%	-21.35%	+4.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.47%	-21.43%	+4.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-5.77%	+4.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-4.16%	+1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	4.07%	-2.08%

Volatility

FCUV.TO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) is 4.79%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 12.12%. This indicates that FCUV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCUV.TO	SPMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.79%	12.12%	-7.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.14%	20.20%	-9.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.95%	22.53%	-7.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.36%	21.13%	-5.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.85%	21.88%	-7.03%

FCUV.TO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUV.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCUV.TO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

FCUV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than SPMO's 0.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCUV.TO Fidelity U.S. Value ETF	0.87%	1.14%	1.03%	1.43%	2.71%	1.10%	3.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	0.69%	0.73%	0.48%	1.63%	1.66%	0.52%	1.27%	1.39%	1.05%	0.77%	1.94%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCUV.TO and SPMO in my portfolio?

FCUV.TO and SPMO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCUV.TO or SPMO?

On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCUV.TO or SPMO?

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FCUV.TO.

What is the main difference between FCUV.TO and SPMO?

FCUV.TO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. FCUV.TO tracks Fidelity Canada U.S. Value Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FCUV.TO and 0.13% for SPMO.