PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF (FCUH.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF (ZDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FCUH.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.28%
6M
8.91%
YTD
10.30%
1Y
10.83%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*

ZDIV.TO

1D
0.96%
1M
2.66%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FCUH.TO and ZDIV.TO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUH.TO
FCUH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FCUH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

ZDIV.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF (FCUH.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF (ZDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCUH.TOZDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUH.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.06%, which is greater than ZDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUH.TO and ZDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCUH.TOZDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.06%

-2.60%

-42.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

0.00%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-0.54%

-5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

Volatility

FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCUH.TOZDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

9.83%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

9.83%

+5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

9.83%

+10.31%

FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUH.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDIV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCUH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than ZDIV.TO's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FCUH.TO
Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF
2.48%2.72%2.41%2.57%3.05%2.32%4.23%2.99%0.29%
ZDIV.TO
BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF
1.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCUH.TO and ZDIV.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FCUH.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FCUH.TO and 0.09% for ZDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCUH.TO and ZDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer