FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO
FCUH.TO (Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF) and ZDIV.TO (BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. FCUH.TO is actively managed, while ZDIV.TO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. FCUH.TO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZDIV.TO.
Performance
FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCUH.TO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 10.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
ZDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCUH.TO Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF | 4.40% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 19.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCUH.TO and ZDIV.TO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCUH.TO
ZDIV.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF (FCUH.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF (ZDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCUH.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCUH.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.06%, which is greater than ZDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUH.TO and ZDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCUH.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.06% | -2.60% | -42.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | 0.00% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -0.54% | -5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | — | — |
Volatility
FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCUH.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.36% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 9.83% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 9.83% | +5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 9.83% | +10.31% |
FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCUH.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDIV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCUH.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCUH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than ZDIV.TO's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCUH.TO Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF | 2.48% | 2.72% | 2.41% | 2.57% | 3.05% | 2.32% | 4.23% | 2.99% | 0.29% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 1.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCUH.TO and ZDIV.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FCUH.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FCUH.TO and 0.09% for ZDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for FCUH.TO and ZDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer