PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCUH.TO vs. FGRO.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCUH.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF (FCUH.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCUH.TO having a 10.30% return and FGRO.NEO slightly higher at 10.79%.


FCUH.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.28%
6M
8.91%
YTD
10.30%
1Y
10.83%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*

FGRO.NEO

1D
0.11%
1M
0.53%
6M
6.87%
YTD
10.79%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
20.57%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUH.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCUH.TO
Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF
10.30%7.12%12.67%9.08%-6.43%25.62%
FGRO.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF
10.79%17.00%25.97%16.92%-8.80%16.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUH.TO and FGRO.NEO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between FCUH.TO and FGRO.NEO has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCUH.TO vs. FGRO.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUH.TO
FCUH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FCUH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FGRO.NEO
FGRO.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FGRO.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRO.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRO.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRO.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRO.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUH.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF (FCUH.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCUH.TOFGRO.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

2.90

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

12.06

-7.65

FCUH.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the FGRO.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUH.TO and FGRO.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCUH.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUH.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.06%, which is greater than FGRO.NEO's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUH.TO and FGRO.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCUH.TOFGRO.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.06%

-17.50%

-27.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-7.54%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.03%

-11.45%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

-17.50%

-4.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-1.61%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-3.11%

-2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

1.81%

+0.56%

Volatility

FCUH.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF (FCUH.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO.NEO) have volatilities of 2.55% and 2.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCUH.TOFGRO.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

2.50%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.36%

8.72%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

10.51%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

10.64%

+4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

10.43%

+9.71%

FCUH.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUH.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FGRO.NEO's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCUH.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FCUH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than FGRO.NEO's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FCUH.TO
Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF
2.48%2.72%2.41%2.57%3.05%2.32%4.23%2.99%0.29%
FGRO.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF
1.12%1.24%1.09%1.39%1.82%0.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCUH.TO and FGRO.NEO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCUH.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCUH.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for FGRO.NEO.

FCUH.TO is categorized as Dividend, while FGRO.NEO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FCUH.TO and 0.42% for FGRO.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCUH.TO and FGRO.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer