FCUH.TO vs. FCIM.NEO
FCUH.TO (Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF) and FCIM.NEO (Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCUH.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCIM.NEO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity Canada International Momentum Index. FCUH.TO is actively managed, while FCIM.NEO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCUH.TO returned 8.27%/yr vs 17.67%/yr for FCIM.NEO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCUH.TO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FCIM.NEO.
Performance
FCUH.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCUH.TO achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly lower than FCIM.NEO's 20.84% return.
FCUH.TO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 10.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
FCIM.NEO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- YTD
- 20.84%
- 1Y
- 38.88%
- 3Y*
- 29.47%
- 5Y*
- 17.67%
- 10Y*
- —
FCUH.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCUH.TO Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF | 10.30% | 7.12% | 12.67% | 9.08% | -6.43% | 31.92% | 11.78% |
FCIM.NEO Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF | 20.84% | 37.03% | 25.38% | 16.54% | -12.40% | 10.86% | 18.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCUH.TO and FCIM.NEO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020 | 0.27 |
The correlation between FCUH.TO and FCIM.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCUH.TO vs. FCIM.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FCUH.TO
FCIM.NEO
FCUH.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF (FCUH.TO) and Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCUH.TO | FCIM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.96 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 11.29 | -6.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCUH.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCUH.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.06%, which is greater than FCIM.NEO's maximum drawdown of -26.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUH.TO and FCIM.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCUH.TO | FCIM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.06% | -26.89% | -18.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -13.21% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.03% | -13.21% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.80% | -26.89% | +5.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -5.21% | +3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -5.38% | -0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 3.45% | -1.08% |
Volatility
FCUH.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF (FCUH.TO) is 2.55%, while Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that FCUH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIM.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCUH.TO | FCIM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 6.80% | -4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.36% | 17.42% | -11.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 19.57% | -7.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 17.55% | -2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 16.93% | +3.21% |
FCUH.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCUH.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FCIM.NEO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCUH.TO vs. FCIM.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FCUH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than FCIM.NEO's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCIM.NEO Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF | 1.32% | 1.59% | 1.26% | 1.70% | 1.86% | 2.70% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCUH.TO Fidelity U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral ETF | 2.48% | 2.72% | 2.41% | 2.57% | 3.05% | 2.32% | 4.23% | 2.99% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCUH.TO and FCIM.NEO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCUH.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCUH.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCIM.NEO.
FCUH.TO is categorized as Dividend, while FCIM.NEO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FCUH.TO and 0.45% for FCIM.NEO.
Find the right allocation for FCUH.TO and FCIM.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer