PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FCUD.TO vs. FCMO.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FCUD.TO vs. FCMO.NEO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

FCUD.TO (Fidelity U.S. High Dividend ETF) and FCMO.NEO (Fidelity US Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCUD.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCMO.NEO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity Canada U.S. Momentum Index. FCUD.TO is actively managed, while FCMO.NEO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCUD.TO returned 9.99%/yr vs 17.92%/yr for FCMO.NEO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCUD.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FCMO.NEO.

Performance

FCUD.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. High Dividend ETF (FCUD.TO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUD.TO achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly lower than FCMO.NEO's 20.14% return.

FCUD.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
0.46%
6M
10.36%
YTD
14.75%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
11.70%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*
—

FCMO.NEO

1D
-0.65%
1M
-1.58%
6M
15.32%
YTD
20.14%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
31.97%
5Y*
17.92%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUD.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FCUD.TO
Fidelity U.S. High Dividend ETF		14.75%-5.65%22.63%8.12%0.48%31.54%8.56%
FCMO.NEO
Fidelity US Momentum ETF		20.14%13.77%53.26%13.09%-14.21%16.13%-61.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUD.TO and FCMO.NEO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity U.S. High Dividend ETF

Fidelity US Momentum ETF

Often compared with FCMO.NEO:
FCMO.NEO vs. SPMOFCMO.NEO vs. VFV.TOFCMO.NEO vs. VMO.TOFCMO.NEO vs. FCUV.TOFCMO.NEO vs. FDMOFCMO.NEO vs. FGEP.TOFCMO.NEO vs. FINN.NEO

Return for Risk

FCUD.TO vs. FCMO.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FCUD.TO
FCUD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FCUD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO
FCMO.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FCMO.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCMO.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUD.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. High Dividend ETF (FCUD.TO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FCUD.TOFCMO.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.43
1.48

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.59
2.11

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.28

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

2.71

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.87

9.01

-8.14

FCUD.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the FCMO.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUD.TO and FCMO.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCUD.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, smaller than the maximum FCMO.NEO drawdown of -67.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUD.TO and FCMO.NEO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FCUD.TOFCMO.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.79%

-67.39%

+28.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.19%

-10.91%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-21.82%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.13%

-26.93%

+10.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-8.56%

+7.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-48.77%

+44.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

3.27%

+2.85%

Volatility

FCUD.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. High Dividend ETF (FCUD.TO) is 1.82%, while Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that FCUD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCMO.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FCUD.TOFCMO.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

5.56%

-3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

16.89%

-10.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

19.99%

-7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.11%

18.36%

-5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

32.59%

-14.77%

FCUD.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUD.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FCMO.NEO's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCUD.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Dividend Comparison

FCUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than FCMO.NEO's 0.30% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FCMO.NEO
Fidelity US Momentum ETF		0.30%0.36%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%
FCUD.TO
Fidelity U.S. High Dividend ETF		2.46%3.13%2.15%2.45%2.72%2.16%4.10%2.90%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

FCUD.TO and FCMO.NEO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCUD.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCUD.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FCMO.NEO.

FCUD.TO is categorized as Dividend, while FCMO.NEO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCUD.TO and 0.38% for FCMO.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCUD.TO and FCMO.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer