PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCTWX vs. FIKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCTWX vs. FIKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class C (FCTWX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTWX achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly higher than FIKFX's 4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FCTWX has outperformed FIKFX with an annualized return of 7.10%, while FIKFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.24% annualized return.


FCTWX

1D
0.30%
1M
2.72%
YTD
7.04%
6M
7.70%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
7.10%

FIKFX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.67%
YTD
4.19%
6M
4.33%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
7.66%
5Y*
3.25%
10Y*
4.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTWX vs. FIKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCTWX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class C
7.04%14.97%6.84%12.34%-17.47%8.75%13.09%19.07%-6.34%14.62%
FIKFX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class
4.19%9.23%4.96%8.28%-11.09%2.79%8.54%10.59%-0.76%6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTWX and FIKFX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2009

0.84

The correlation between FCTWX and FIKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCTWX vs. FIKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTWX
FCTWX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FCTWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKFX
FIKFX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FIKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTWX vs. FIKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class C (FCTWX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCTWXFIKFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

2.63

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.05

3.92

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.54

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.15

-0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.12

14.03

-2.92

FCTWX vs. FIKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the FIKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTWX and FIKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCTWXFIKFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.63

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.64

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.96

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

1.01

-0.59

Drawdowns

FCTWX vs. FIKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTWX drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than FIKFX's maximum drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTWX and FIKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCTWXFIKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-15.03%

-34.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.58%

-3.32%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.78%

-4.76%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.34%

-15.03%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.34%

-15.03%

-9.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-1.72%

-4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

0.74%

+0.80%

Volatility

FCTWX vs. FIKFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class C (FCTWX) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX) at 1.49%. This indicates that FCTWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCTWXFIKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

1.49%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.71%

3.31%

+3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.02%

3.98%

+4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.90%

5.12%

+4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.13%

4.44%

+5.69%

FCTWX vs. FIKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTWX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKFX's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCTWX vs. FIKFX - Dividend Comparison

FCTWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, more than FIKFX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCTWX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class C
7.34%7.21%3.17%1.33%8.34%8.77%5.65%5.88%8.78%3.95%3.79%4.30%
FIKFX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class
3.19%3.40%3.13%2.85%3.06%2.04%2.18%7.27%2.94%1.89%1.65%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FCTWX and FIKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCTWX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to FIKFX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTWX dropped -49.97% vs FIKFX's -15.03%.

FIKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCTWX and FIKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer